Seek Returns logo

AME vs. MMM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AME and MMM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMEMMM
Company NameAMETEK, Inc.3M Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentIndustrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization42.86 billion USD83.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 19, 1984January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AME and MMM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AME vs. MMM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMEMMM
5-Day Price Return0.20%0.98%
13-Week Price Return3.94%4.05%
26-Week Price Return-1.74%3.76%
52-Week Price Return12.32%21.19%
Month-to-Date Return0.39%4.44%
Year-to-Date Return2.95%20.73%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.13M2.99M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.32M3.40M
3-Month Volatility17.69%23.22%
Beta1.131.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AME

14.53%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

AME’s Return on Equity of 14.53% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
14.23%
Median
7.81%
Q1
5.91%
Min
-3.58%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

20.60%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

AME’s Net Profit Margin of 20.60% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
18.70%
Q3
12.58%
Median
9.26%
Q1
3.87%
Min
-2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

26.24%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

AME’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
25.69%
Q3
17.03%
Median
12.85%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMEMMM
Return on Equity (TTM)14.53%91.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.66%9.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.60%16.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.24%19.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.12%41.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AME

1.63

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

AME’s Current Ratio of 1.63 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.64
Median
1.38
Q1
1.13
Min
0.61

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AME

0.19

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, AME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.47
Median
0.99
Q1
0.66
Min
0.21

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AME

15.71

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

AME’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.71 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
11.17
Q3
8.02
Median
5.88
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMEMMM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.631.72
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.041.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.193.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.71-15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

AME vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AME vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AME

0.64%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMM

1.88%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
10.17%
Q3
5.53%
Median
3.14%
Q1
1.88%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AME

18.94%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.94% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
181.91%
Q3
95.57%
Median
50.60%
Q1
35.01%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMEMMM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.64%1.88%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.94%39.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AME

29.53

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

AME’s P/E Ratio of 29.53 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMM

20.92

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
36.98
Q3
22.09
Median
12.18
Q1
8.93
Min
5.63

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 20.92 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AME

6.08

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

AME’s P/S Ratio of 6.08 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MMM

3.35

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.60
Q3
2.10
Median
0.68
Q1
0.42
Min
0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AME

4.02

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

AME’s P/B Ratio of 4.02 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.89
Q3
2.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.60
Min
0.27

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMEMMM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)29.5320.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.083.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.0218.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.2230.86