Seek Returns logo

AME vs. MMM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AME and MMM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

MMM’s market capitalization of 82.31 billion USD is significantly greater than AME’s 42.53 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 1.11 for AME and 1.08 for MMM, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAMEMMM
Company NameAMETEK, Inc.3M Company
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryConglomerates
CEODavid A. ZapicoWilliam M. Brown
Price184.19 USD152.94 USD
Market Cap42.53 billion USD82.31 billion USD
Beta1.111.08
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateJuly 19, 1984January 14, 1946
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AME and MMM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AME vs. MMM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AME

14.75%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
36.51%
Q3
18.65%
Median
12.08%
Q1
4.75%
Min
-15.57%

AME’s Return on Equity of 14.75% is on par with the norm for the Industrial - Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MMM

103.44%

Conglomerates Industry

Max
32.32%
Q3
19.13%
Median
1.34%
Q1
-7.64%
Min
-24.88%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 103.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AME

11.22%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.64%
Median
9.33%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-5.42%

AME’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.22% is in line with the norm for the Industrial - Machinery industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

MMM

12.96%

Conglomerates Industry

Max
14.84%
Q3
10.21%
Median
2.12%
Q1
-1.56%
Min
-8.42%

In the upper quartile for the Conglomerates industry, MMM’s Return on Invested Capital of 12.96% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AME

20.43%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.85%
Q3
15.25%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-8.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.43% places AME in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MMM

17.79%

Conglomerates Industry

Max
17.79%
Q3
8.39%
Median
0.20%
Q1
-6.01%
Min
-15.20%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.79% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AME

26.20%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.19%
Q3
19.04%
Median
14.62%
Q1
8.13%
Min
-5.76%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.20% places AME in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MMM

20.07%

Conglomerates Industry

Max
20.46%
Q3
13.14%
Median
4.91%
Q1
-3.97%
Min
-12.21%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.07% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMEMMM
Return on Equity (TTM)14.75%103.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.52%10.92%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)11.22%12.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.43%17.79%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.20%20.07%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.18%40.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AME

1.41

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.75
Median
2.07
Q1
1.46
Min
0.46

AME’s Current Ratio of 1.41 falls into the lower quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MMM

1.66

Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.07
Q3
2.46
Median
1.62
Q1
1.05
Min
0.85

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.66 aligns with the median group of the Conglomerates industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AME

0.19

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.73
Median
0.48
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

AME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Industrial - Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MMM

3.15

Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.88
Median
1.37
Q1
0.53
Min
0.08

MMM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Conglomerates industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.15. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AME

23.38

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.91
Q3
14.99
Median
9.11
Q1
3.95
Min
-11.30

AME’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.38 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MMM

4.45

Conglomerates Industry

Max
9.89
Q3
4.13
Median
2.19
Q1
-0.55
Min
-0.55

MMM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.45 is in the upper quartile for the Conglomerates industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMEMMM
Current Ratio (TTM)1.411.66
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.861.25
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.193.15
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.130.35
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.731.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)23.384.45

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AME and MMM. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AME

0.64%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
4.40%
Q3
1.47%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial - Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMM

1.87%

Conglomerates Industry

Max
30.53%
Q3
8.27%
Median
1.92%
Q1
0.96%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.87% is consistent with its peers in the Conglomerates industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AME

18.74%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
78.48%
Q3
36.22%
Median
20.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.74% is within the typical range for the Industrial - Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM

35.38%

Conglomerates Industry

Max
1,392.58%
Q3
51.50%
Median
35.38%
Q1
13.88%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.38% is within the typical range for the Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMEMMM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.64%1.87%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.74%35.38%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AME

29.98

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
47.62
Q3
34.41
Median
27.36
Q1
21.62
Min
10.96

AME’s P/E Ratio of 29.98 is within the middle range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMM

19.07

Conglomerates Industry

Max
63.95
Q3
37.12
Median
22.66
Q1
17.80
Min
12.89

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 19.07 is within the middle range for the Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AME

4.01

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
6.15
Q3
3.53
Median
2.82
Q1
1.71
Min
0.09

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Industrial - Machinery industry.

MMM

2.15

Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.39
Q3
2.48
Median
1.54
Q1
1.36
Min
0.00

MMM’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.15 is within the middle range of its peers in the Conglomerates industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AME

6.13

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
8.37
Q3
4.59
Median
3.34
Q1
1.83
Min
0.32

AME’s P/S Ratio of 6.13 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MMM

3.36

Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.75
Q3
1.98
Median
0.99
Q1
0.45
Min
0.06

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.36 is in the upper echelon for the Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AME

4.26

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
5.01
Median
3.41
Q1
2.45
Min
0.01

AME’s P/B Ratio of 4.26 is within the conventional range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MMM

18.63

Conglomerates Industry

Max
8.49
Q3
4.09
Median
1.23
Q1
0.97
Min
0.36

At 18.63, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AME vs. MMM: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMEMMM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.9819.07
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.012.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)6.133.36
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.2618.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)24.82-1192.89
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.0013.65
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.353.67