Seek Returns logo

AME vs. MAS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AME and MAS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AME’s market capitalization of 42.53 billion USD is substantially larger than MAS’s 14.00 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.11 for AME and 1.19 for MAS, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAMEMAS
Company NameAMETEK, Inc.Masco Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryConstruction
CEODavid A. ZapicoKeith J. Allman
Price184.19 USD66.38 USD
Market Cap42.53 billion USD14.00 billion USD
Beta1.111.19
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateJuly 19, 1984March 17, 1980
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AME and MAS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AME vs. MAS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AME

14.75%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
36.51%
Q3
18.65%
Median
12.08%
Q1
4.75%
Min
-15.57%

AME’s Return on Equity of 14.75% is on par with the norm for the Industrial - Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MAS

-489.51%

Construction Industry

Max
40.76%
Q3
26.03%
Median
16.38%
Q1
5.66%
Min
-4.01%

MAS has a negative Return on Equity of -489.51%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AME vs. MAS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Construction industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AME

11.22%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.64%
Median
9.33%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-5.42%

AME’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.22% is in line with the norm for the Industrial - Machinery industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

MAS

27.38%

Construction Industry

Max
27.38%
Q3
15.45%
Median
9.91%
Q1
5.86%
Min
2.28%

In the upper quartile for the Construction industry, MAS’s Return on Invested Capital of 27.38% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AME vs. MAS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Construction industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AME

20.43%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.85%
Q3
15.25%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-8.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.43% places AME in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MAS

10.29%

Construction Industry

Max
24.94%
Q3
14.61%
Median
10.07%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-9.49%

MAS’s Net Profit Margin of 10.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AME vs. MAS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Construction industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AME

26.20%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.19%
Q3
19.04%
Median
14.62%
Q1
8.13%
Min
-5.76%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.20% places AME in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MAS

17.27%

Construction Industry

Max
24.04%
Q3
19.17%
Median
13.63%
Q1
7.69%
Min
-7.88%

MAS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.27% is around the midpoint for the Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AME vs. MAS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Construction industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMEMAS
Return on Equity (TTM)14.75%-489.51%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.52%15.53%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)11.22%27.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.43%10.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.20%17.27%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.18%36.22%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AME

1.41

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.75
Median
2.07
Q1
1.46
Min
0.46

AME’s Current Ratio of 1.41 falls into the lower quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MAS

1.75

Construction Industry

Max
4.22
Q3
2.59
Median
1.84
Q1
1.44
Min
0.96

MAS’s Current Ratio of 1.75 aligns with the median group of the Construction industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AME vs. MAS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Construction industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AME

0.19

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.73
Median
0.48
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

AME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Industrial - Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MAS

-13.02

Construction Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
1.15
Median
0.84
Q1
0.56
Min
0.05

MAS has a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of -13.02, which indicates negative shareholder equity where liabilities exceed assets. This is a critical sign of financial distress.

AME vs. MAS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Construction industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AME

23.38

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.91
Q3
14.99
Median
9.11
Q1
3.95
Min
-11.30

AME’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.38 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MAS

13.17

Construction Industry

Max
30.91
Q3
15.60
Median
7.16
Q1
2.73
Min
-4.26

MAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.17 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AME vs. MAS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Construction industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMEMAS
Current Ratio (TTM)1.411.75
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.861.09
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.19-13.02
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.130.65
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.732.24
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)23.3813.17

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AME and MAS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AME vs. MAS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AME vs. MAS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AME vs. MAS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AME

0.64%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
4.40%
Q3
1.47%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial - Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MAS

1.81%

Construction Industry

Max
2.43%
Q3
1.20%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.81%, MAS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Construction industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AME vs. MAS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Construction industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AME

18.74%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
78.48%
Q3
36.22%
Median
20.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.74% is within the typical range for the Industrial - Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MAS

32.28%

Construction Industry

Max
84.31%
Q3
28.17%
Median
11.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.28% is in the upper quartile for the Construction industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AME vs. MAS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Construction industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMEMAS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.64%1.81%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.74%32.28%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AME

29.98

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
47.62
Q3
34.41
Median
27.36
Q1
21.62
Min
10.96

AME’s P/E Ratio of 29.98 is within the middle range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MAS

17.75

Construction Industry

Max
52.50
Q3
32.30
Median
22.66
Q1
14.68
Min
9.62

MAS’s P/E Ratio of 17.75 is within the middle range for the Construction industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AME vs. MAS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Construction industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AME

4.01

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
6.15
Q3
3.53
Median
2.82
Q1
1.71
Min
0.09

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Industrial - Machinery industry.

MAS

1.19

Construction Industry

Max
4.11
Q3
2.42
Median
1.60
Q1
1.15
Min
0.27

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Construction industry.

AME vs. MAS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Construction industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AME

6.13

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
8.37
Q3
4.59
Median
3.34
Q1
1.83
Min
0.32

AME’s P/S Ratio of 6.13 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MAS

1.82

Construction Industry

Max
5.26
Q3
3.38
Median
1.63
Q1
0.99
Min
0.09

MAS’s P/S Ratio of 1.82 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AME vs. MAS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Construction industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AME

4.26

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
5.01
Median
3.41
Q1
2.45
Min
0.01

AME’s P/B Ratio of 4.26 is within the conventional range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MAS

-55.40

Construction Industry

Max
12.88
Q3
6.91
Median
3.04
Q1
1.93
Min
0.71

MAS has a negative P/B Ratio of -55.40, indicating its liabilities exceed its assets and result in negative shareholder equity. This is a critical warning sign of financial distress.

AME vs. MAS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Construction industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMEMAS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.9817.75
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.011.19
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)6.131.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.26-55.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)24.8216.63
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.0012.95
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.352.20