AME vs. HUBB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AME and HUBB, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AME dominates in value with a market cap of 41.02 billion USD, eclipsing HUBB’s 20.23 billion USD by roughly 2.03×.
With betas of 1.12 for AME and 0.96 for HUBB, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AME | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AMETEK, Inc. | Hubbell Incorporated |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| CEO | Mr. David A. Zapico | Mr. Gerben W. Bakker |
| Price | 177.68 USD | 379.04 USD |
| Market Cap | 41.02 billion USD | 20.23 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.12 | 0.96 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | July 19, 1984 | June 5, 1972 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AME and HUBB over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AME and HUBB, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AME | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 28.93 | 25.65 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 3.87 | 1.91 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.91 | 3.62 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.11 | 6.27 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 23.94 | 26.26 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 20.29 | 16.91 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.13 | 3.91 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 24.83 | 28.42 |
Dividend Comparison
HUBB stands out with a 1.34% dividend yield—around 107% above AME’s 0.65%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | AME | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.65% | 1.34% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AME and HUBB, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- HUBB posts a quick ratio of 0.73, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AME at 0.86 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
| Symbol | AME | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.41 | 1.17 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.86 | 0.73 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.61 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 0.29 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 23.38 | 21.00 |