Seek Returns logo

AME vs. FLR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AME and FLR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AME’s market capitalization of 42.53 billion USD is substantially larger than FLR’s 8.69 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.11 for AME and 1.30 for FLR, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAMEFLR
Company NameAMETEK, Inc.Fluor Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryEngineering & Construction
CEODavid A. ZapicoJames R. Breuer
Price184.19 USD52.76 USD
Market Cap42.53 billion USD8.69 billion USD
Beta1.111.30
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateJuly 19, 1984December 1, 2000
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AME and FLR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AME vs. FLR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AME

14.75%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
36.51%
Q3
18.65%
Median
12.08%
Q1
4.75%
Min
-15.57%

AME’s Return on Equity of 14.75% is on par with the norm for the Industrial - Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FLR

61.85%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

FLR’s Return on Equity of 61.85% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AME vs. FLR: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AME

11.22%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.64%
Median
9.33%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-5.42%

AME’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.22% is in line with the norm for the Industrial - Machinery industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

FLR

-0.10%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

FLR has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.10%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AME vs. FLR: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AME

20.43%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.85%
Q3
15.25%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-8.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.43% places AME in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FLR

11.14%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.14% places FLR in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AME vs. FLR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AME

26.20%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.19%
Q3
19.04%
Median
14.62%
Q1
8.13%
Min
-5.76%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.20% places AME in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FLR

3.03%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.03% is in the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AME vs. FLR: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMEFLR
Return on Equity (TTM)14.75%61.85%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.52%21.90%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)11.22%-0.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.43%11.14%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.20%3.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.18%3.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AME

1.41

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.75
Median
2.07
Q1
1.46
Min
0.46

AME’s Current Ratio of 1.41 falls into the lower quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FLR

1.74

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.74 is in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AME vs. FLR: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AME

0.19

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.73
Median
0.48
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

AME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Industrial - Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FLR

0.30

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 is typical for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AME vs. FLR: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AME

23.38

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.91
Q3
14.99
Median
9.11
Q1
3.95
Min
-11.30

AME’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.38 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

FLR

11.16

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

FLR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.16 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AME vs. FLR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMEFLR
Current Ratio (TTM)1.411.74
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.861.74
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.190.30
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.130.13
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.73-2.22
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)23.3811.16

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AME and FLR. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AME vs. FLR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AME vs. FLR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AME vs. FLR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AME

0.64%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
4.40%
Q3
1.47%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial - Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLR

0.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AME vs. FLR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AME

18.74%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
78.48%
Q3
36.22%
Median
20.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.74% is within the typical range for the Industrial - Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FLR

0.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AME vs. FLR: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMEFLR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.64%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.74%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AME

29.98

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
47.62
Q3
34.41
Median
27.36
Q1
21.62
Min
10.96

AME’s P/E Ratio of 29.98 is within the middle range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLR

4.84

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

In the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry, FLR’s P/E Ratio of 4.84 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AME vs. FLR: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AME

4.01

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
6.15
Q3
3.53
Median
2.82
Q1
1.71
Min
0.09

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Industrial - Machinery industry.

FLR

0.41

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

AME vs. FLR: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AME

6.13

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
8.37
Q3
4.59
Median
3.34
Q1
1.83
Min
0.32

AME’s P/S Ratio of 6.13 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FLR

0.52

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

In the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.52 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AME vs. FLR: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AME

4.26

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
5.01
Median
3.41
Q1
2.45
Min
0.01

AME’s P/B Ratio of 4.26 is within the conventional range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FLR

2.49

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

FLR’s P/B Ratio of 2.49 is in the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AME vs. FLR: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMEFLR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.984.84
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.010.41
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)6.130.52
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.262.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)24.8216.97
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.0012.10
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.350.44