Seek Returns logo

AME vs. CTAS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AME and CTAS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

CTAS’s market capitalization of 88.57 billion USD is significantly greater than AME’s 42.53 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 1.11 for AME and 1.06 for CTAS, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAMECTAS
Company NameAMETEK, Inc.Cintas Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial - MachinerySpecialty Business Services
CEODavid A. ZapicoTodd M. Schneider
Price184.19 USD219.36 USD
Market Cap42.53 billion USD88.57 billion USD
Beta1.111.06
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateJuly 19, 1984August 19, 1983
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AME and CTAS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AME vs. CTAS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AME

14.75%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
36.51%
Q3
18.65%
Median
12.08%
Q1
4.75%
Min
-15.57%

AME’s Return on Equity of 14.75% is on par with the norm for the Industrial - Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CTAS

41.30%

Specialty Business Services Industry

Max
30.24%
Q3
17.20%
Median
7.32%
Q1
4.37%
Min
-13.44%

CTAS’s Return on Equity of 41.30% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialty Business Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AME vs. CTAS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Specialty Business Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AME

11.22%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.64%
Median
9.33%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-5.42%

AME’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.22% is in line with the norm for the Industrial - Machinery industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

CTAS

22.69%

Specialty Business Services Industry

Max
22.69%
Q3
10.02%
Median
5.30%
Q1
1.55%
Min
-1.58%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Business Services industry, CTAS’s Return on Invested Capital of 22.69% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AME vs. CTAS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Specialty Business Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AME

20.43%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.85%
Q3
15.25%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-8.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.43% places AME in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CTAS

17.53%

Specialty Business Services Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
11.60%
Median
5.65%
Q1
1.65%
Min
-5.21%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.53% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Specialty Business Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AME vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Specialty Business Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AME

26.20%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.19%
Q3
19.04%
Median
14.62%
Q1
8.13%
Min
-5.76%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.20% places AME in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CTAS

22.77%

Specialty Business Services Industry

Max
29.40%
Q3
16.52%
Median
5.78%
Q1
1.54%
Min
-5.17%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.77% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Specialty Business Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AME vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Specialty Business Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMECTAS
Return on Equity (TTM)14.75%41.30%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.52%18.50%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)11.22%22.69%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.43%17.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.20%22.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.18%49.51%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AME

1.41

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.75
Median
2.07
Q1
1.46
Min
0.46

AME’s Current Ratio of 1.41 falls into the lower quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CTAS

1.72

Specialty Business Services Industry

Max
2.21
Q3
1.84
Median
1.52
Q1
0.94
Min
0.26

CTAS’s Current Ratio of 1.72 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Business Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AME vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Specialty Business Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AME

0.19

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.73
Median
0.48
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

AME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Industrial - Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CTAS

0.59

Specialty Business Services Industry

Max
1.02
Q3
0.93
Median
0.62
Q1
0.22
Min
0.03

CTAS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Specialty Business Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AME vs. CTAS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Specialty Business Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AME

23.38

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.91
Q3
14.99
Median
9.11
Q1
3.95
Min
-11.30

AME’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.38 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CTAS

22.84

Specialty Business Services Industry

Max
15.61
Q3
6.91
Median
3.29
Q1
0.04
Min
-8.58

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.84, CTAS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Specialty Business Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AME vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Specialty Business Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMECTAS
Current Ratio (TTM)1.411.72
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.861.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.190.59
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.130.28
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.730.86
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)23.3822.84

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AME and CTAS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AME vs. CTAS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AME vs. CTAS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AME vs. CTAS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AME

0.64%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
4.40%
Q3
1.47%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial - Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CTAS

0.98%

Specialty Business Services Industry

Max
4.40%
Q3
1.37%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Yield of 0.98% is consistent with its peers in the Specialty Business Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AME vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Specialty Business Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AME

18.74%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
78.48%
Q3
36.22%
Median
20.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.74% is within the typical range for the Industrial - Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CTAS

33.25%

Specialty Business Services Industry

Max
79.38%
Q3
51.62%
Median
23.75%
Q1
1.08%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.25% is within the typical range for the Specialty Business Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AME vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Specialty Business Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMECTAS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.64%0.98%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.74%33.25%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AME

29.98

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
47.62
Q3
34.41
Median
27.36
Q1
21.62
Min
10.96

AME’s P/E Ratio of 29.98 is within the middle range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CTAS

49.81

Specialty Business Services Industry

Max
52.23
Q3
42.83
Median
32.04
Q1
16.00
Min
2.24

A P/E Ratio of 49.81 places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Specialty Business Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AME vs. CTAS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Specialty Business Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AME

4.01

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
6.15
Q3
3.53
Median
2.82
Q1
1.71
Min
0.09

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Industrial - Machinery industry.

CTAS

4.88

Specialty Business Services Industry

Max
4.93
Q3
3.34
Median
2.19
Q1
0.14
Min
0.06

A Forward PEG Ratio of 4.88 places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Specialty Business Services industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

AME vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Specialty Business Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AME

6.13

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
8.37
Q3
4.59
Median
3.34
Q1
1.83
Min
0.32

AME’s P/S Ratio of 6.13 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CTAS

8.65

Specialty Business Services Industry

Max
6.26
Q3
3.60
Median
1.90
Q1
0.73
Min
0.34

With a P/S Ratio of 8.65, CTAS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Specialty Business Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AME vs. CTAS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Specialty Business Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AME

4.26

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
5.01
Median
3.41
Q1
2.45
Min
0.01

AME’s P/B Ratio of 4.26 is within the conventional range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CTAS

19.29

Specialty Business Services Industry

Max
3.69
Q3
3.69
Median
2.13
Q1
1.55
Min
0.59

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Specialty Business Services industry.

AME vs. CTAS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Specialty Business Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMECTAS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.9849.81
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.014.88
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)6.138.65
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.2619.29
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)24.8248.05
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.0031.82
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.358.90