Seek Returns logo

AME vs. CSL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AME and CSL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMECSL
Company NameAMETEK, Inc.Carlisle Companies Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentBuilding Products
Market Capitalization42.44 billion USD14.02 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 19, 1984February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AME and CSL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AME vs. CSL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMECSL
5-Day Price Return-1.67%-1.80%
13-Week Price Return-0.24%-17.54%
26-Week Price Return6.74%-3.66%
52-Week Price Return9.24%-26.34%
Month-to-Date Return-2.26%-0.28%
Year-to-Date Return1.94%-11.06%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.22M0.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.30M0.50M
3-Month Volatility17.69%43.77%
Beta1.050.97

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AME

14.53%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.67%
Q3
23.64%
Median
11.74%
Q1
6.08%
Min
-4.39%

AME’s Return on Equity of 14.53% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CSL

33.90%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, CSL’s Return on Equity of 33.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AME vs. CSL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

20.60%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.60%
Q3
10.26%
Median
5.83%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-0.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.60% places AME in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CSL

16.12%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.12% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AME vs. CSL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

26.24%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.24%
Q3
14.53%
Median
7.97%
Q1
3.45%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.24% places AME in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CSL

21.17%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AME vs. CSL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMECSL
Return on Equity (TTM)14.53%33.90%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.66%13.86%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.60%16.12%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.24%21.17%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.12%36.92%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AME

1.63

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.09
Median
1.48
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

AME’s Current Ratio of 1.63 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CSL

2.19

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

CSL’s Current Ratio of 2.19 is in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AME vs. CSL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AME

0.19

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.96
Median
0.57
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, AME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CSL

0.89

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

CSL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AME vs. CSL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AME

15.71

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
44.15
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
0.98
Min
-19.47

AME’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.71 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CSL

86.45

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 86.45, CSL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Building Products industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AME vs. CSL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMECSL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.632.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.041.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.190.89
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.7186.45

Growth

Revenue Growth

AME vs. CSL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AME vs. CSL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AME

0.64%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.04%
Q3
1.58%
Median
1.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CSL

1.26%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Yield of 1.26% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AME vs. CSL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AME

18.94%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
165.68%
Q3
71.84%
Median
38.15%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.94% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CSL

22.20%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.20% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AME vs. CSL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMECSL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.64%1.26%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.94%22.20%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AME

29.59

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
65.02
Q3
38.99
Median
27.41
Q1
19.88
Min
8.37

AME’s P/E Ratio of 29.59 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CSL

17.56

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

CSL’s P/E Ratio of 17.56 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AME vs. CSL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AME

6.09

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.01
Q3
4.03
Median
1.79
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

AME’s P/S Ratio of 6.09 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CSL

2.83

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

CSL’s P/S Ratio of 2.83 aligns with the market consensus for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AME vs. CSL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AME

4.02

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.97
Q3
5.57
Median
3.50
Q1
1.66
Min
0.64

AME’s P/B Ratio of 4.02 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CSL

7.62

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

CSL’s P/B Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper tier for the Building Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AME vs. CSL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMECSL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)29.5917.56
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.092.83
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.027.62
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.2615.98