AME vs. CSL: AMETEK vs. Carlisle Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do AMETEK (AME) and Carlisle (CSL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

AMETEK (AME) and Carlisle (CSL) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but AME is classified in Electrical Equipment while CSL is classified in Building Products.

Company profile comparison for AMETEK (AME) and Carlisle (CSL)
Profile Item	AME	CSL
Name	AMETEK, Inc.	Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Electrical Equipment	Building Products
GICS Sub-Industry	Electrical Components & Equipment	Building Products
Market Capitalization	52.44 billion USD	14.52 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	July 19, 1984	February 21, 1973
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

AME

CSL

GSPC

AMETEK (AME) vs. Carlisle (CSL), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for AMETEK (AME) and Carlisle (CSL). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for AMETEK (AME) and Carlisle (CSL). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for AMETEK (AME) and Carlisle (CSL)
Metric	AME	CSL
Total Return (1Y)	22.79%	24.99%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	18.31%	15.85%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	12.17%	12.02%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

AME

CSL

GSPC

AMETEK (AME) vs. Carlisle (CSL), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for AMETEK (AME) and Carlisle (CSL). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for AMETEK (AME) and Carlisle (CSL)
Metric	AME	CSL
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	24.96%	38.46%
Beta (5Y)	0.96	0.76
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-27.06%	-37.72%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.45M	509.16K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

AME and CSL are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for AMETEK (AME) and Carlisle (CSL)
Metric	AME	CSL
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.74	0.54
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	1.06	0.87

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Carlisle (CSL) at 42.34% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than AMETEK (AME) at 14.68%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

AME

Capital Goods industry group

14.68%

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
AME: 14.68%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

42.34%

CSL: 42.34%
Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

AMETEK (AME) vs. Carlisle (CSL): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both AMETEK (AME) at 19.91% and Carlisle (CSL) at 13.78% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

AME

Capital Goods industry group

19.91%

Max: 27.47%
AME: 19.91%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

13.78%

Max: 27.47%
CSL: 13.78%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

AMETEK (AME) vs. Carlisle (CSL): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both AMETEK (AME) at 26.38% and Carlisle (CSL) at 20.21% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

AME

Capital Goods industry group

26.38%

Max: 36.60%
AME: 26.38%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

20.21%

Max: 36.60%
CSL: 20.21%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

AMETEK (AME) vs. Carlisle (CSL): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for AMETEK (AME) and Carlisle (CSL)
Metric	AME	CSL
ROE (TTM)	14.68%	42.34%
ROA (TTM)	7.06%	10.20%
Net Margin (TTM)	19.91%	13.78%
Operating Margin (TTM)	26.38%	20.21%
Gross Margin (TTM)	36.97%	34.66%

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMETEK (AME) at 6.63% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Carlisle (CSL) at 0.33% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

AMETEK (AME) vs. Carlisle (CSL): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

AMETEK (AME) at 7.93% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Carlisle (CSL) at -38.46% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

AMETEK (AME) vs. Carlisle (CSL): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for AMETEK (AME) and Carlisle (CSL)
Metric	AME	CSL
Revenue Growth (YoY)	6.63%	0.33%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	6.36%	-2.70%
EPS Growth (YoY)	7.93%	-38.46%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	8.50%	-0.84%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both AMETEK (AME) at 1.43 and Carlisle (CSL) at 2.41 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

AME

Capital Goods industry group

1.43

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
AME: 1.43
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.36

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

2.41

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
CSL: 2.41
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.36

AMETEK (AME) vs. Carlisle (CSL): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

AMETEK (AME) at 0.60 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Carlisle (CSL) at 2.01 uses more debt funding than most peers.

AME

Capital Goods industry group

0.60

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
AME: 0.60
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

2.01

Max: 2.33
CSL: 2.01
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

AMETEK (AME) vs. Carlisle (CSL): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for AMETEK (AME) and Carlisle (CSL)
Metric	AME	CSL
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.43	2.41
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.60	2.01
Net Debt / EBITDA	2.41	1.93

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Carlisle (CSL) at 1.20% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while AMETEK (AME) at 0.60% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CSL the richer one.

AME

Capital Goods industry group

0.60%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
AME: 0.60%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

1.20%

Max: 2.66%
CSL: 1.20%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AMETEK (AME) vs. Carlisle (CSL): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both AMETEK (AME) at 18.76% and Carlisle (CSL) at 25.50% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

AME

Capital Goods industry group

18.76%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
AME: 18.76%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

25.50%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
CSL: 25.50%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AMETEK (AME) vs. Carlisle (CSL): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for AMETEK (AME) and Carlisle (CSL)
Metric	AME	CSL
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.60%	1.20%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	18.76%	25.50%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both AMETEK (AME) at 32.25 and Carlisle (CSL) at 21.06 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

AME

Capital Goods industry group

32.25

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
AME: 32.25
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

21.06

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
CSL: 21.06
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

AMETEK (AME) vs. Carlisle (CSL): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Carlisle (CSL) at 2.79 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while AMETEK (AME) at 6.40 sits in the pricier quartile — AME costs more per dollar of sales.

AME

Capital Goods industry group

6.40

Max: 7.54
AME: 6.40
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

2.79

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
CSL: 2.79
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

AMETEK (AME) vs. Carlisle (CSL): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

AMETEK (AME) at 4.48 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Carlisle (CSL) at 10.11 prices above its benchmark range — CSL looks rich relative to book.

AME

Capital Goods industry group

4.48

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
AME: 4.48
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

10.11

CSL: 10.11
Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

AMETEK (AME) vs. Carlisle (CSL): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for AMETEK (AME) and Carlisle (CSL)
Metric	AME	CSL
P/E Ratio (TTM)	32.25	21.06
P/S Ratio (TTM)	6.40	2.79
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	4.48	10.11
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	2.89%	4.01%