Seek Returns logo

AME vs. CRS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AME and CRS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMECRS
Company NameAMETEK, Inc.Carpenter Technology Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsMaterials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentMetals & Mining
Market Capitalization45.08 billion USD16.76 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 19, 1984February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AME and CRS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AME vs. CRS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMECRS
5-Day Price Return-2.35%0.96%
13-Week Price Return6.62%35.92%
26-Week Price Return7.12%47.20%
52-Week Price Return-1.05%86.83%
Month-to-Date Return-4.33%4.62%
Year-to-Date Return7.27%94.74%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.33M0.66M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.30M0.90M
3-Month Volatility22.48%56.37%
Beta1.061.32

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AME

14.49%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.25%
Q3
23.48%
Median
11.69%
Q1
6.40%
Min
-4.39%

AME’s Return on Equity of 14.49% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRS

22.68%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.65%
Q3
18.32%
Median
9.95%
Q1
1.68%
Min
-21.32%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CRS’s Return on Equity of 22.68% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AME vs. CRS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

20.50%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.74%
Q3
10.52%
Median
6.30%
Q1
3.04%
Min
-0.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.50% places AME in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRS

14.30%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
46.52%
Q3
20.04%
Median
7.57%
Q1
1.57%
Min
-25.46%

CRS’s Net Profit Margin of 14.30% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AME vs. CRS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

26.16%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.16%
Q3
14.51%
Median
8.86%
Q1
4.72%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.16% places AME in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRS

19.41%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
72.27%
Q3
33.90%
Median
14.82%
Q1
2.88%
Min
-23.81%

CRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.41% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AME vs. CRS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMECRS
Return on Equity (TTM)14.49%22.68%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.64%12.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.50%14.30%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.16%19.41%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.18%27.95%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AME

1.16

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
2.05
Median
1.44
Q1
1.14
Min
0.85

AME’s Current Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRS

4.44

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.84
Median
1.95
Q1
1.40
Min
0.41

CRS’s Current Ratio of 4.44 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AME vs. CRS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AME

0.23

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.91
Median
0.55
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, AME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.23 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CRS

0.36

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.49
Median
0.31
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

CRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AME vs. CRS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AME

15.71

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
47.39
Q3
20.31
Median
9.84
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

AME’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.71 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRS

13.14

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
21.58
Median
5.63
Q1
0.75
Min
-24.82

CRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AME vs. CRS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMECRS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.164.44
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.722.37
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.230.36
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.7113.14

Growth

Revenue Growth

AME vs. CRS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AME vs. CRS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AME

0.63%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.91%
Q3
1.66%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Yield of 0.63% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRS

0.24%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
7.02%
Q3
2.91%
Median
1.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.24% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AME vs. CRS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AME

19.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
130.92%
Q3
64.56%
Median
37.60%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.00% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRS

12.66%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
151.02%
Q3
64.89%
Median
32.13%
Q1
7.15%
Min
0.00%

CRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.66% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AME vs. CRS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMECRS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.63%0.24%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)19.00%12.66%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AME

30.07

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
51.71
Q3
37.50
Median
23.51
Q1
19.68
Min
8.22

AME’s P/E Ratio of 30.07 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRS

40.53

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
77.73
Q3
39.76
Median
20.87
Q1
13.12
Min
2.01

A P/E Ratio of 40.53 places CRS in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AME vs. CRS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AME

6.17

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.22
Q3
4.00
Median
1.70
Q1
1.04
Min
0.43

AME’s P/S Ratio of 6.17 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CRS

5.80

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.17
Q3
4.39
Median
2.43
Q1
0.91
Min
0.15

CRS’s P/S Ratio of 5.80 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AME vs. CRS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AME

4.12

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.81
Q3
5.42
Median
3.69
Q1
1.77
Min
0.78

AME’s P/B Ratio of 4.12 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRS

6.40

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.38
Q3
3.01
Median
1.72
Q1
1.15
Min
0.34

At 6.40, CRS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AME vs. CRS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMECRS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)30.0740.53
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.175.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.126.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.8958.61