Seek Returns logo

AME vs. BAH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AME and BAH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AME’s market capitalization of 42.53 billion USD is substantially larger than BAH’s 13.52 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

AME’s beta of 1.11 points to significantly higher volatility compared to BAH (beta: 0.49), suggesting AME has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAMEBAH
Company NameAMETEK, Inc.Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryConsulting Services
CEODavid A. ZapicoHoracio D. Rozanski
Price184.19 USD108.93 USD
Market Cap42.53 billion USD13.52 billion USD
Beta1.110.49
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateJuly 19, 1984November 18, 2010
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AME and BAH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AME vs. BAH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AME

14.75%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
36.51%
Q3
18.65%
Median
12.08%
Q1
4.75%
Min
-15.57%

AME’s Return on Equity of 14.75% is on par with the norm for the Industrial - Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BAH

84.96%

Consulting Services Industry

Max
26.22%
Q3
25.78%
Median
23.70%
Q1
12.26%
Min
8.67%

BAH’s Return on Equity of 84.96% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Consulting Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AME vs. BAH: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AME

11.22%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.64%
Median
9.33%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-5.42%

AME’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.22% is in line with the norm for the Industrial - Machinery industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

BAH

--

Consulting Services Industry

Max
33.93%
Q3
19.78%
Median
12.27%
Q1
8.32%
Min
5.66%

Return on Invested Capital data for BAH is currently unavailable.

AME vs. BAH: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AME

20.43%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.85%
Q3
15.25%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-8.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.43% places AME in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BAH

6.20%

Consulting Services Industry

Max
22.69%
Q3
14.78%
Median
7.88%
Q1
6.68%
Min
5.45%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Consulting Services industry, BAH’s Net Profit Margin of 6.20% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AME vs. BAH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AME

26.20%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.19%
Q3
19.04%
Median
14.62%
Q1
8.13%
Min
-5.76%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.20% places AME in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BAH

9.14%

Consulting Services Industry

Max
34.23%
Q3
21.10%
Median
10.99%
Q1
9.29%
Min
8.13%

BAH’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.14% is in the lower quartile for the Consulting Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AME vs. BAH: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMEBAH
Return on Equity (TTM)14.75%84.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.52%--
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)11.22%--
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.43%6.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.20%9.14%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.18%66.28%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AME

1.41

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.75
Median
2.07
Q1
1.46
Min
0.46

AME’s Current Ratio of 1.41 falls into the lower quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BAH

--

Consulting Services Industry

Max
3.32
Q3
2.20
Median
1.69
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

Current Ratio data for BAH is currently unavailable.

AME vs. BAH: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AME

0.19

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.73
Median
0.48
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

AME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Industrial - Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BAH

--

Consulting Services Industry

Max
1.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.17
Min
0.06

Debt-to-Equity Ratio data for BAH is currently unavailable.

AME vs. BAH: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AME

23.38

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.91
Q3
14.99
Median
9.11
Q1
3.95
Min
-11.30

AME’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.38 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

BAH

7.67

Consulting Services Industry

Max
45.92
Q3
30.67
Median
10.52
Q1
7.67
Min
3.02

BAH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.67 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Consulting Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AME vs. BAH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMEBAH
Current Ratio (TTM)1.41--
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.86--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.19--
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.13--
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.73--
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)23.387.67

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AME and BAH. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AME vs. BAH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AME vs. BAH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AME vs. BAH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AME

0.64%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
4.40%
Q3
1.47%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial - Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BAH

1.95%

Consulting Services Industry

Max
2.06%
Q3
0.84%
Median
0.54%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.95%, BAH offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Consulting Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AME vs. BAH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AME

18.74%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
78.48%
Q3
36.22%
Median
20.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.74% is within the typical range for the Industrial - Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BAH

36.10%

Consulting Services Industry

Max
55.92%
Q3
28.27%
Median
23.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BAH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.10% is in the upper quartile for the Consulting Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AME vs. BAH: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMEBAH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.64%1.95%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.74%36.10%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AME

29.98

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
47.62
Q3
34.41
Median
27.36
Q1
21.62
Min
10.96

AME’s P/E Ratio of 29.98 is within the middle range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BAH

18.84

Consulting Services Industry

Max
51.91
Q3
40.33
Median
21.50
Q1
17.51
Min
10.23

BAH’s P/E Ratio of 18.84 is within the middle range for the Consulting Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AME vs. BAH: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AME

4.01

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
6.15
Q3
3.53
Median
2.82
Q1
1.71
Min
0.09

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Industrial - Machinery industry.

BAH

2.00

Consulting Services Industry

Max
4.82
Q3
3.61
Median
2.04
Q1
1.65
Min
0.72

BAH’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.00 is within the middle range of its peers in the Consulting Services industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AME vs. BAH: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AME

6.13

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
8.37
Q3
4.59
Median
3.34
Q1
1.83
Min
0.32

AME’s P/S Ratio of 6.13 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BAH

1.13

Consulting Services Industry

Max
6.73
Q3
4.77
Median
1.83
Q1
1.28
Min
0.77

In the lower quartile for the Consulting Services industry, BAH’s P/S Ratio of 1.13 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AME vs. BAH: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AME

4.26

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
5.01
Median
3.41
Q1
2.45
Min
0.01

AME’s P/B Ratio of 4.26 is within the conventional range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BAH

--

Consulting Services Industry

Max
8.62
Q3
6.18
Median
4.55
Q1
2.94
Min
1.61

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Consulting Services industry.

AME vs. BAH: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMEBAH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.9818.84
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.012.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)6.131.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.26--
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)24.8218.86
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.0010.88
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.351.13