Seek Returns logo

AME vs. BA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AME and BA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMEBA
Company NameAMETEK, Inc.The Boeing Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization43.29 billion USD166.82 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 19, 1984January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AME and BA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AME vs. BA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMEBA
5-Day Price Return0.98%0.78%
13-Week Price Return3.89%2.58%
26-Week Price Return6.27%20.15%
52-Week Price Return9.26%41.54%
Month-to-Date Return1.73%-0.29%
Year-to-Date Return4.29%21.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.30M9.62M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.29M7.79M
3-Month Volatility17.60%24.31%
Beta1.131.19

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AME

14.53%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.67%
Q3
23.64%
Median
11.74%
Q1
6.08%
Min
-4.39%

AME’s Return on Equity of 14.53% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BA

2,402.16%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
37.11%
Q3
20.14%
Median
11.72%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-6.24%

BA’s Return on Equity of 2,402.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AME vs. BA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

20.60%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.60%
Q3
10.26%
Median
5.83%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-0.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.60% places AME in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BA

-14.18%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.66%
Q3
8.61%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.92%
Min
1.01%

BA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -14.18%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AME vs. BA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

26.24%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.24%
Q3
14.53%
Median
7.97%
Q1
3.45%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.24% places AME in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BA

-12.27%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.83%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-2.15%

BA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.27%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AME vs. BA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMEBA
Return on Equity (TTM)14.53%2,402.16%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.66%-7.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.60%-14.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.24%-12.27%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.12%-0.32%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AME

1.63

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.09
Median
1.48
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

AME’s Current Ratio of 1.63 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BA

1.23

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
2.03
Median
1.24
Q1
1.04
Min
0.77

BA’s Current Ratio of 1.23 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AME vs. BA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AME

0.19

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.96
Median
0.57
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, AME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BA

117.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
0.96
Median
0.63
Q1
0.37
Min
0.03

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 117.95, BA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AME vs. BA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AME

15.71

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
44.15
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
0.98
Min
-19.47

AME’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.71 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BA

-3.60

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.08
Median
7.25
Q1
2.65
Min
-7.63

BA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.60. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AME vs. BA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMEBA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.631.23
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.040.38
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.19117.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.71-3.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

AME vs. BA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AME vs. BA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AME

0.63%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.04%
Q3
1.58%
Median
1.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Yield of 0.63% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BA

0.10%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.72%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.08%
Min
0.00%

BA’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AME vs. BA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AME

18.94%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
165.68%
Q3
71.84%
Median
38.15%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.94% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BA

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
50.43%
Median
17.11%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

BA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AME vs. BA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMEBA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.63%0.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.94%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AME

30.14

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
65.02
Q3
38.99
Median
27.41
Q1
19.88
Min
8.37

AME’s P/E Ratio of 30.14 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BA

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
67.20
Q3
55.74
Median
33.28
Q1
27.49
Min
15.02

P/E Ratio data for BA is currently unavailable.

AME vs. BA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AME

6.21

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.01
Q3
4.03
Median
1.79
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

AME’s P/S Ratio of 6.21 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BA

2.16

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
4.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.33

BA’s P/S Ratio of 2.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AME vs. BA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AME

4.02

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.97
Q3
5.57
Median
3.50
Q1
1.66
Min
0.64

AME’s P/B Ratio of 4.02 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BA

1,764.78

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.90
Q3
8.93
Median
4.70
Q1
3.03
Min
0.83

At 1,764.78, BA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AME vs. BA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMEBA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)30.14--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.212.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.021,764.78
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.7429.42