Seek Returns logo

AMD vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMD and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMDUBER
Company NameAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentGround Transportation
Market Capitalization330.59 billion USD208.75 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMD and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMD vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMDUBER
5-Day Price Return25.91%2.17%
13-Week Price Return51.12%3.54%
26-Week Price Return98.20%37.14%
52-Week Price Return25.09%37.24%
Month-to-Date Return25.91%2.17%
Year-to-Date Return68.65%65.95%
10-Day Avg. Volume60.15M14.83M
3-Month Avg. Volume54.86M19.01M
3-Month Volatility61.39%28.55%
Beta1.881.19

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMD

4.88%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

AMD’s Return on Equity of 4.88% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AMD vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMD

9.57%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

AMD’s Net Profit Margin of 9.57% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AMD vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMD

7.66%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

AMD’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.66% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMD vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMDUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)4.88%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.97%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.57%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.66%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)47.62%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMD

2.49

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

AMD’s Current Ratio of 2.49 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMD vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMD

0.05

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

AMD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.05 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AMD vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMD

14.93

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

AMD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AMD vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMDUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.491.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.560.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.050.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.93-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMD vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMD vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMD

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMD vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMD

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMD vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMDUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMD

120.05

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

At 120.05, AMD’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UBER

16.67

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 16.67 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMD vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMD

11.49

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

AMD’s P/S Ratio of 11.49 is in the upper echelon for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER

4.45

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 4.45, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AMD vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMD

3.86

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

AMD’s P/B Ratio of 3.86 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AMD vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMDUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)120.0516.67
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)11.494.45
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.868.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)84.1524.65