Seek Returns logo

AMD vs. SOUN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMD and SOUN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMD’s market capitalization of 223.61 billion USD is substantially larger than SOUN’s 4.45 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.99 for AMD and 2.87 for SOUN, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAMDSOUN
Company NameAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.SoundHound AI, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsSoftware - Application
CEOLisa T. SuKeyvan Mohajer
Price137.91 USD11.09 USD
Market Cap223.61 billion USD4.45 billion USD
Beta1.992.87
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980April 28, 2022
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMD and SOUN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMD vs. SOUN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMD

3.89%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

AMD’s Return on Equity of 3.89% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SOUN

-68.55%

Software - Application Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
17.85%
Median
4.73%
Q1
-10.56%
Min
-52.94%

SOUN has a negative Return on Equity of -68.55%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AMD vs. SOUN: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMD

3.29%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

AMD’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.29% is in line with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

SOUN

-34.12%

Software - Application Industry

Max
35.07%
Q3
9.72%
Median
0.76%
Q1
-8.68%
Min
-34.12%

SOUN has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -34.12%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AMD vs. SOUN: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMD

8.03%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

AMD’s Net Profit Margin of 8.03% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SOUN

-184.34%

Software - Application Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
16.07%
Median
1.83%
Q1
-9.60%
Min
-45.64%

SOUN has a negative Net Profit Margin of -184.34%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AMD vs. SOUN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMD

9.62%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

AMD’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.62% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SOUN

-184.97%

Software - Application Industry

Max
51.67%
Q3
15.35%
Median
1.79%
Q1
-12.42%
Min
-45.17%

SOUN has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -184.97%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AMD vs. SOUN: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMDSOUN
Return on Equity (TTM)3.89%-68.55%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.11%-32.07%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)3.29%-34.12%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.03%-184.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.62%-184.97%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.09%44.69%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMD

2.80

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

AMD’s Current Ratio of 2.80 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SOUN

4.92

Software - Application Industry

Max
5.09
Q3
2.84
Median
1.70
Q1
1.12
Min
0.04

SOUN’s Current Ratio of 4.92 is in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AMD vs. SOUN: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMD

0.08

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AMD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SOUN

0.01

Software - Application Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
0.77
Median
0.18
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Software - Application industry, SOUN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.01 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AMD vs. SOUN: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMD

30.69

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

AMD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 30.69 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SOUN

-30.16

Software - Application Industry

Max
39.23
Q3
8.55
Median
1.48
Q1
-14.59
Min
-39.97

SOUN has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -30.16. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AMD vs. SOUN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMDSOUN
Current Ratio (TTM)2.804.92
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.974.92
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.080.01
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.070.01
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.221.36
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)30.69-30.16

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMD and SOUN. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMD vs. SOUN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMD vs. SOUN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMD vs. SOUN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMD

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SOUN

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
3.66%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SOUN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMD vs. SOUN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMD

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SOUN

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
81.09%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SOUN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMD vs. SOUN: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMDSOUN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMD

100.32

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

At 100.32, AMD’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SOUN

-23.18

Software - Application Industry

Max
194.31
Q3
98.56
Median
51.87
Q1
22.76
Min
1.02

SOUN has a negative P/E Ratio of -23.18. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AMD vs. SOUN: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMD

2.56

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

SOUN

0.23

Software - Application Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
6.57
Median
2.78
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Software - Application industry, SOUN’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.23 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

AMD vs. SOUN: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMD

8.06

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

AMD’s P/S Ratio of 8.06 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SOUN

43.54

Software - Application Industry

Max
23.49
Q3
11.14
Median
5.62
Q1
2.84
Min
0.33

With a P/S Ratio of 43.54, SOUN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software - Application industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AMD vs. SOUN: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMD

3.86

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

AMD’s P/B Ratio of 3.86 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SOUN

11.00

Software - Application Industry

Max
21.03
Q3
10.49
Median
6.36
Q1
2.89
Min
0.12

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.

AMD vs. SOUN: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMDSOUN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)100.32-23.18
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.560.23
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)8.0643.54
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)3.8611.00
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)81.22-41.66
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)37.22-23.80
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.0141.18