AMD vs. QBTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on July 7, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AMD and QBTS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMD’s market capitalization of 223.61 billion USD is substantially larger than QBTS’s 5.19 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.99 for AMD and 1.48 for QBTS, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

Symbol	AMD	QBTS
Company Name	Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.	D-Wave Quantum Inc.
Country	US	CA
Sector	Technology	Technology
Industry	Semiconductors	Computer Hardware
CEO	Lisa T. Su	Alan E. Baratz
Price	137.91 USD	16.79 USD
Market Cap	223.61 billion USD	5.19 billion USD
Beta	1.99	1.48
Exchange	NASDAQ	NYSE
IPO Date	March 17, 1980	December 11, 2020
ADR	No	No

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMD and QBTS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMD vs. QBTS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMD

3.89%

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 41.84%
Q3: 15.81%
Median: 6.31%
Q1: -5.54%
Min: -30.12%

AMD’s Return on Equity of 3.89% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

QBTS

-227.95%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max: 123.03%
Q3: 15.78%
Median: -13.44%
Q1: -119.16%
Min: -227.95%

QBTS has a negative Return on Equity of -227.95%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AMD vs. QBTS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMD

3.29%

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 30.91%
Q3: 11.34%
Median: 4.08%
Q1: -2.17%
Min: -19.59%

AMD’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.29% is in line with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

QBTS

-22.72%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max: 30.37%
Q3: 20.44%
Median: 7.03%
Q1: -12.47%
Min: -31.70%

QBTS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -22.72%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AMD vs. QBTS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMD

8.03%

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 51.69%
Q3: 19.67%
Median: 8.56%
Q1: -5.44%
Min: -38.60%

AMD’s Net Profit Margin of 8.03% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

QBTS

-617.83%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max: 40.72%
Q3: 10.87%
Median: 4.33%
Q1: -378.64%
Min: -753.20%

QBTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -617.83%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AMD vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMD

9.62%

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 58.03%
Q3: 22.12%
Median: 8.40%
Q1: -3.73%
Min: -36.14%

AMD’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.62% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

QBTS

-332.34%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max: 42.27%
Q3: 13.53%
Median: 4.56%
Q1: -295.01%
Min: -592.84%

QBTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -332.34%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AMD vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AMD	QBTS
Return on Equity (TTM)	3.89%	-227.95%
Return on Assets (TTM)	3.11%	-40.54%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)	3.29%	-22.72%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	8.03%	-617.83%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	9.62%	-332.34%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	50.09%	83.23%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMD

2.80

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 9.10
Q3: 5.23
Median: 3.09
Q1: 2.49
Min: 1.02

AMD’s Current Ratio of 2.80 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

QBTS

20.73

Computer Hardware Industry

Max: 20.73
Q3: 11.54
Median: 2.69
Q1: 1.40
Min: 0.73

QBTS’s Current Ratio of 20.73 is in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AMD vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMD

0.08

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 0.97
Q3: 0.46
Median: 0.21
Q1: 0.05
Min: 0.00

AMD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

QBTS

0.04

Computer Hardware Industry

Max: 1.36
Q3: 0.67
Median: 0.04
Q1: 0.03
Min: 0.00

QBTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.04 is typical for the Computer Hardware industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMD vs. QBTS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMD

30.69

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 36.25
Q3: 29.12
Median: 7.01
Q1: -1.22
Min: -18.18

AMD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 30.69 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

QBTS

-28.05

Computer Hardware Industry

Max: 32.50
Q3: 21.85
Median: 4.98
Q1: -7.71
Min: -34.24

QBTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -28.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AMD vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AMD	QBTS
Current Ratio (TTM)	2.80	20.73
Quick Ratio (TTM)	1.97	20.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)	0.08	0.04
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)	0.07	0.02
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)	-0.22	2.22
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	30.69	-28.05

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMD and QBTS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMD vs. QBTS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMD vs. QBTS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMD vs. QBTS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMD

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 6.48%
Q3: 0.93%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AMD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

QBTS

0.00%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max: 9.24%
Q3: 1.58%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

QBTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMD vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMD

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 204.29%
Q3: 31.85%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AMD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

QBTS

0.00%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max: 193.79%
Q3: 30.72%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

QBTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMD vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AMD	QBTS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMD

100.32

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 86.15
Q3: 47.38
Median: 27.87
Q1: 18.89
Min: 4.73

At 100.32, AMD’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

QBTS

-36.44

Computer Hardware Industry

Max: 24.60
Q3: 24.01
Median: 20.31
Q1: 18.24
Min: 13.38

QBTS has a negative P/E Ratio of -36.44. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AMD vs. QBTS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMD

2.56

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 4.73
Q3: 2.80
Median: 1.11
Q1: 0.68
Min: 0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

QBTS

1.37

Computer Hardware Industry

Max: 9.77
Q3: 5.18
Median: 1.77
Q1: 1.17
Min: 0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Computer Hardware industry.

AMD vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMD

8.06

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 21.96
Q3: 10.21
Median: 4.45
Q1: 2.32
Min: 0.48

AMD’s P/S Ratio of 8.06 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

QBTS

242.82

Computer Hardware Industry

Max: 57.61
Q3: 47.40
Median: 3.37
Q1: 1.56
Min: 0.43

With a P/S Ratio of 242.82, QBTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Computer Hardware industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AMD vs. QBTS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMD

3.86

Semiconductors Industry

Max: 13.12
Q3: 6.49
Median: 3.31
Q1: 1.74
Min: 0.23

AMD’s P/B Ratio of 3.86 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

QBTS

23.19

Computer Hardware Industry

Max: 21.21
Q3: 14.71
Median: 9.28
Q1: 3.74
Min: 0.43

At 23.19, QBTS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Computer Hardware industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AMD vs. QBTS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AMD	QBTS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)	100.32	-36.44
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)	2.56	1.37
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)	8.06	242.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)	3.86	23.19
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)	81.22	-99.42
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)	37.22	-36.61
EV-to-Sales (TTM)	8.01	228.95