Seek Returns logo

AMD vs. MS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMD and MS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMDMS
Company NameAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.Morgan Stanley
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentCapital Markets
Market Capitalization330.59 billion USD252.36 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980February 23, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMD and MS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMD vs. MS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMDMS
5-Day Price Return25.91%-0.55%
13-Week Price Return51.12%9.98%
26-Week Price Return98.20%36.59%
52-Week Price Return25.09%51.18%
Month-to-Date Return25.91%-0.55%
Year-to-Date Return68.65%25.75%
10-Day Avg. Volume60.15M5.14M
3-Month Avg. Volume54.86M5.28M
3-Month Volatility61.39%17.83%
Beta1.881.23

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMD

4.88%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

AMD’s Return on Equity of 4.88% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MS

13.95%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
22.24%
Median
13.52%
Q1
8.61%
Min
-4.25%

MS’s Return on Equity of 13.95% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMD

9.57%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

AMD’s Net Profit Margin of 9.57% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MS

13.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
69.91%
Q3
37.24%
Median
24.30%
Q1
13.06%
Min
-15.18%

MS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.06% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Capital Markets industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMD

7.66%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

AMD’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.66% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MS

17.07%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
84.86%
Q3
47.16%
Median
32.23%
Q1
18.65%
Min
-21.87%

MS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.07% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMDMS
Return on Equity (TTM)4.88%13.95%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.97%1.15%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.57%13.06%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.66%17.07%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)47.62%54.42%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMD

2.49

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

AMD’s Current Ratio of 2.49 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MS

0.29

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
1.81
Median
1.01
Q1
0.56
Min
0.04

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMD

0.05

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

AMD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.05 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MS

7.68

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
2.79
Median
0.96
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMD

14.93

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

AMD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MS

1.25

Capital Markets Industry

Max
107.59
Q3
48.41
Median
10.85
Q1
4.56
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMDMS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.490.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.560.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.057.68
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.931.25

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMD vs. MS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMD vs. MS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMD

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MS

2.52%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.02%
Q3
4.54%
Median
2.55%
Q1
1.27%
Min
0.00%

MS’s Dividend Yield of 2.52% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMD

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MS

43.20%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
199.38%
Q3
99.28%
Median
60.67%
Q1
32.00%
Min
0.00%

MS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 43.20% is within the typical range for the Capital Markets industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMDMS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.52%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%43.20%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMD

120.05

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

At 120.05, AMD’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MS

17.11

Capital Markets Industry

Max
51.69
Q3
29.42
Median
17.58
Q1
12.55
Min
5.59

MS’s P/E Ratio of 17.11 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMD

11.49

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

AMD’s P/S Ratio of 11.49 is in the upper echelon for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MS

2.23

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.65
Q3
7.29
Median
4.53
Q1
2.26
Min
0.04

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, MS’s P/S Ratio of 2.23 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMD

3.86

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

AMD’s P/B Ratio of 3.86 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MS

2.08

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.83
Q3
5.12
Median
2.66
Q1
1.19
Min
0.37

MS’s P/B Ratio of 2.08 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMDMS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)120.0517.11
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)11.492.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.862.08
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)84.1511.48