Seek Returns logo

AMD vs. MS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMD and MS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMD’s market capitalization stands at 223.61 billion USD, while MS’s is 231.25 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

AMD’s beta of 1.99 points to significantly higher volatility compared to MS (beta: 1.29), suggesting AMD has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAMDMS
Company NameAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.Morgan Stanley
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyFinancial Services
IndustrySemiconductorsFinancial - Capital Markets
CEOLisa T. SuEdward N. Pick
Price137.91 USD144.14 USD
Market Cap223.61 billion USD231.25 billion USD
Beta1.991.29
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980February 23, 1993
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMD and MS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMD vs. MS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMD

3.89%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

AMD’s Return on Equity of 3.89% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MS

14.01%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
42.02%
Q3
20.69%
Median
13.73%
Q1
3.33%
Min
-21.32%

MS’s Return on Equity of 14.01% is on par with the norm for the Financial - Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMD

3.29%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

AMD’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.29% is in line with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

MS

2.64%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
30.24%
Q3
13.34%
Median
6.20%
Q1
-1.71%
Min
-16.91%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Financial - Capital Markets industry.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMD

8.03%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

AMD’s Net Profit Margin of 8.03% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MS

13.52%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
28.67%
Q3
13.52%
Median
10.47%
Q1
0.24%
Min
-9.55%

MS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.52% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial - Capital Markets industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMD

9.62%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

AMD’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.62% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MS

17.73%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
56.86%
Q3
25.29%
Median
15.90%
Q1
0.51%
Min
-19.18%

MS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.73% is around the midpoint for the Financial - Capital Markets industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMDMS
Return on Equity (TTM)3.89%14.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.11%1.18%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)3.29%2.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.03%13.52%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.62%17.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.09%56.30%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMD

2.80

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

AMD’s Current Ratio of 2.80 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MS

0.66

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
4.60
Q3
3.24
Median
1.32
Q1
0.96
Min
0.05

For the Financial - Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMD

0.08

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AMD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MS

3.45

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.68
Median
0.37
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

MS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Financial - Capital Markets industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.45. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMD

30.69

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

AMD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 30.69 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MS

0.41

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
12.71
Q3
7.94
Median
1.92
Q1
0.24
Min
-7.71

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial - Capital Markets industry.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMDMS
Current Ratio (TTM)2.800.66
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.970.66
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.083.45
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.070.30
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.2211.97
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)30.690.41

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMD and MS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMD

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MS

2.57%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
5.86%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.57%, MS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Financial - Capital Markets industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMD

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MS

42.94%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
128.06%
Q3
43.11%
Median
12.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 42.94% is within the typical range for the Financial - Capital Markets industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMDMS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%42.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMD

100.32

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

At 100.32, AMD’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MS

15.97

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
42.65
Q3
29.09
Median
20.52
Q1
14.58
Min
8.28

MS’s P/E Ratio of 15.97 is within the middle range for the Financial - Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMD

2.56

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

MS

2.27

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
4.05
Q3
2.46
Median
1.52
Q1
0.78
Min
0.02

MS’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.27 is within the middle range of its peers in the Financial - Capital Markets industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMD

8.06

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

AMD’s P/S Ratio of 8.06 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MS

2.19

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.34
Q3
7.63
Median
2.98
Q1
1.50
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial - Capital Markets industry.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMD

3.86

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

AMD’s P/B Ratio of 3.86 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MS

2.18

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.60
Q3
6.00
Median
2.91
Q1
1.84
Min
0.53

MS’s P/B Ratio of 2.18 is within the conventional range for the Financial - Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AMD vs. MS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMDMS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)100.3215.97
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.562.27
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)8.062.19
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)3.862.18
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)81.22-110.12
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)37.2221.68
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.014.88