AMD vs. HUBS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMD and HUBS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMD dominates in value with a market cap of 181.69 billion USD, eclipsing HUBS’s 32.76 billion USD by roughly 5.55×.
With betas of 1.97 for AMD and 1.79 for HUBS, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AMD | HUBS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | HubSpot, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Application |
| CEO | Dr. Lisa T. Su Ph.D. | Ms. Yamini Rangan |
| Price | 112.06 USD | 621.25 USD |
| Market Cap | 181.69 billion USD | 32.76 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.97 | 1.79 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | October 9, 2014 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMD and HUBS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AMD and HUBS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- HUBS shows a negative P/E of -1402.69, highlighting a year of losses, whereas AMD at 81.52 trades on solid profitability.
- HUBS shows a negative forward PEG of -74.96, signaling expected earnings contraction, while AMD at 2.14 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | AMD | HUBS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 81.52 | -1402.69 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.14 | -74.96 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 6.55 | 12.03 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 3.14 | 16.16 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 66.00 | 53.77 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 30.34 | 370.00 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.50 | 12.04 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 65.52 | 53.82 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AMD nor HUBS currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | AMD | HUBS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMD and HUBS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AMD meets its interest obligations (ratio 30.69). In stark contrast, HUBS’s negative ratio (-33.04) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | AMD | HUBS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.80 | 1.66 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.97 | 1.66 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.33 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.07 | 0.17 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 30.69 | -33.04 |