AMD vs. GS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMD and GS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With AMD at 181.69 billion USD and GS at 182.10 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
AMD’s beta of 1.97 points to much larger expected swings compared to GS’s calmer 1.31, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
Symbol | AMD | GS |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Financial Services |
Industry | Semiconductors | Financial - Capital Markets |
CEO | Dr. Lisa T. Su Ph.D. | Mr. David Solomon |
Price | 112.06 USD | 593.46 USD |
Market Cap | 181.69 billion USD | 182.10 billion USD |
Beta | 1.97 | 1.31 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | May 4, 1999 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMD and GS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AMD and GS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- GS reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -7.43, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AMD at 66.00 maintains positive cash flow.
Symbol | AMD | GS |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 81.52 | 12.79 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.14 | 1.07 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 6.55 | 3.54 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 3.14 | 107.80 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 66.00 | -7.43 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 30.34 | 9.85 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.50 | 3.54 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 65.52 | -7.43 |
Dividend Comparison
AMD offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while GS provides a 1.98% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
Symbol | AMD | GS |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.98% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMD and GS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- GS’s low interest coverage (0.23) means it doesn't cover interest from operating earnings. AMD (at 30.69) meets its interest obligations.
Symbol | AMD | GS |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.80 | 2.35 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.97 | 2.35 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.04 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.07 | 0.02 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 30.69 | 0.23 |