Seek Returns logo

AMD vs. GDS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMD and GDS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMD’s market capitalization of 223.61 billion USD is substantially larger than GDS’s 140.20 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

AMD’s beta of 1.99 points to significantly higher volatility compared to GDS (beta: 0.23), suggesting AMD has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

GDS is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. AMD, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolAMDGDS
Company NameAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.GDS Holdings Limited
CountryUSCN
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsInformation Technology Services
CEOLisa T. SuWei Huang
Price137.91 USD33.98 USD
Market Cap223.61 billion USD140.20 billion USD
Beta1.990.23
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980November 2, 2016
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMD and GDS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMD vs. GDS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMD

3.89%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

AMD’s Return on Equity of 3.89% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GDS

16.65%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

GDS’s Return on Equity of 16.65% is on par with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMD vs. GDS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMD

3.29%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

AMD’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.29% is in line with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

GDS

1.92%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

GDS’s Return on Invested Capital of 1.92% is in line with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AMD vs. GDS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMD

8.03%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

AMD’s Net Profit Margin of 8.03% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GDS

30.83%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 30.83% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Information Technology Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

AMD vs. GDS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMD

9.62%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

AMD’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.62% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GDS

10.23%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

GDS’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.23% is around the midpoint for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMD vs. GDS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMDGDS
Return on Equity (TTM)3.89%16.65%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.11%4.65%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)3.29%1.92%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.03%30.83%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.62%10.23%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.09%22.02%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMD

2.80

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

AMD’s Current Ratio of 2.80 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GDS

1.28

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

GDS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Information Technology Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMD vs. GDS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMD

0.08

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AMD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GDS

1.89

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Information Technology Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.89. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AMD vs. GDS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMD

30.69

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

AMD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 30.69 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

GDS

0.74

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.74 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

AMD vs. GDS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMDGDS
Current Ratio (TTM)2.801.28
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.971.28
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.081.89
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.070.60
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.227.92
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)30.690.74

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMD and GDS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMD vs. GDS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMD vs. GDS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMD vs. GDS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMD

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GDS

0.00%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMD vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMD

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GDS

0.00%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMD vs. GDS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMDGDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMD

100.32

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

At 100.32, AMD’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GDS

35.44

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

GDS’s P/E Ratio of 35.44 is within the middle range for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMD vs. GDS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMD

2.56

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

GDS

28.19

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

GDS’s Forward PEG Ratio of 28.19 is exceptionally high for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

AMD vs. GDS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMD

8.06

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

AMD’s P/S Ratio of 8.06 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GDS

4.26

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 4.26 is in the upper echelon for the Information Technology Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AMD vs. GDS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMD

3.86

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

AMD’s P/B Ratio of 3.86 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GDS

5.16

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

AMD vs. GDS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMDGDS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)100.3235.44
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.5628.19
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)8.064.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)3.865.16
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)81.22-9.58
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)37.2218.16
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.017.55