Seek Returns logo

AMD vs. COST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at AMD and COST, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

COST stands out with 454.91 billion USD in market value—about 2.50× AMD’s market cap of 181.69 billion USD.

AMD’s beta of 1.97 points to much larger expected swings compared to COST’s calmer 0.99, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.

SymbolAMDCOST
Company NameAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.Costco Wholesale Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyConsumer Defensive
IndustrySemiconductorsDiscount Stores
CEODr. Lisa T. Su Ph.D.Mr. Ron M. Vachris
Price112.06 USD1,025.3 USD
Market Cap181.69 billion USD454.91 billion USD
Beta1.970.99
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980July 9, 1986
ADRNoNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AMD and COST over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMD and COST, please refer to the table below.

SymbolAMDCOST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)81.5259.73
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.145.78
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)6.551.72
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)3.1417.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)66.0065.69
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)30.3440.04
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.501.71
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)65.5265.07

Dividend Comparison

AMD offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while COST provides a 0.47% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.

SymbolAMDCOST
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.47%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AMD and COST, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • COST’s current ratio of 1.00 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AMD at 2.80 maintains healthy liquidity.
  • COST posts a quick ratio of 0.49, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AMD at 1.97 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
SymbolAMDCOST
Current Ratio (TTM)2.801.00
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.970.49
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.080.31
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.070.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)30.69573.59