Seek Returns logo

AMD vs. COST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMD and COST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

COST’s market capitalization of 437.72 billion USD is significantly greater than AMD’s 223.61 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AMD’s beta of 1.99 points to significantly higher volatility compared to COST (beta: 0.99), suggesting AMD has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAMDCOST
Company NameAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.Costco Wholesale Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyConsumer Defensive
IndustrySemiconductorsDiscount Stores
CEOLisa T. SuRon M. Vachris
Price137.91 USD987.02 USD
Market Cap223.61 billion USD437.72 billion USD
Beta1.990.99
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980July 9, 1986
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMD and COST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMD vs. COST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMD

3.89%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

AMD’s Return on Equity of 3.89% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

COST

31.13%

Discount Stores Industry

Max
31.68%
Q3
28.60%
Median
15.53%
Q1
12.21%
Min
12.12%

In the upper quartile for the Discount Stores industry, COST’s Return on Equity of 31.13% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AMD vs. COST: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMD

3.29%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

AMD’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.29% is in line with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

COST

20.02%

Discount Stores Industry

Max
20.02%
Q3
12.27%
Median
11.13%
Q1
6.51%
Min
5.03%

In the upper quartile for the Discount Stores industry, COST’s Return on Invested Capital of 20.02% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AMD vs. COST: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMD

8.03%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

AMD’s Net Profit Margin of 8.03% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

COST

2.92%

Discount Stores Industry

Max
2.92%
Q3
2.92%
Median
2.81%
Q1
2.75%
Min
2.75%

COST’s Net Profit Margin of 2.92% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Discount Stores industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMD vs. COST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMD

9.62%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

AMD’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.62% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

COST

3.75%

Discount Stores Industry

Max
5.42%
Q3
5.42%
Median
4.33%
Q1
3.93%
Min
2.10%

COST’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.75% is in the lower quartile for the Discount Stores industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AMD vs. COST: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMDCOST
Return on Equity (TTM)3.89%31.13%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.11%10.39%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)3.29%20.02%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.03%2.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.62%3.75%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.09%13.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMD

2.80

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

AMD’s Current Ratio of 2.80 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

COST

1.02

Discount Stores Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
1.23
Median
1.02
Q1
0.78
Min
0.74

COST’s Current Ratio of 1.02 aligns with the median group of the Discount Stores industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMD vs. COST: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMD

0.08

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AMD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

COST

0.30

Discount Stores Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.40
Median
0.80
Q1
0.31
Min
0.20

Falling into the lower quartile for the Discount Stores industry, COST’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AMD vs. COST: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMD

30.69

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

AMD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 30.69 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

COST

916.73

Discount Stores Industry

Max
18.46
Q3
17.45
Median
13.09
Q1
10.49
Min
1.08

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 916.73, COST demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Discount Stores industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AMD vs. COST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMDCOST
Current Ratio (TTM)2.801.02
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.970.52
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.080.30
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.070.11
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.22-0.49
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)30.69916.73

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMD and COST. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMD vs. COST: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMD vs. COST: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMD vs. COST: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMD

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

COST

0.48%

Discount Stores Industry

Max
4.51%
Q3
0.91%
Median
0.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

COST’s Dividend Yield of 0.48% is consistent with its peers in the Discount Stores industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AMD vs. COST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMD

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

COST

19.69%

Discount Stores Industry

Max
44.99%
Q3
36.65%
Median
19.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

COST’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.69% is within the typical range for the Discount Stores industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMD vs. COST: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMDCOST
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.48%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%19.69%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMD

100.32

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

At 100.32, AMD’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

COST

55.87

Discount Stores Industry

Max
55.76
Q3
45.00
Median
33.38
Q1
22.25
Min
10.79

At 55.87, COST’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Discount Stores industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AMD vs. COST: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMD

2.56

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

COST

5.06

Discount Stores Industry

Max
5.06
Q3
3.70
Median
2.97
Q1
2.24
Min
1.25

A Forward PEG Ratio of 5.06 places COST in the upper quartile for the Discount Stores industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

AMD vs. COST: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMD

8.06

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

AMD’s P/S Ratio of 8.06 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

COST

1.63

Discount Stores Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.63
Median
0.96
Q1
0.64
Min
0.43

COST’s P/S Ratio of 1.63 is in the upper echelon for the Discount Stores industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AMD vs. COST: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMD

3.86

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

AMD’s P/B Ratio of 3.86 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

COST

16.15

Discount Stores Industry

Max
16.12
Q3
9.30
Median
5.40
Q1
3.27
Min
2.73

At 16.15, COST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Discount Stores industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AMD vs. COST: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMDCOST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)100.3255.87
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.565.06
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)8.061.63
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)3.8616.15
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)81.2259.82
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)37.2237.31
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.011.61