AMCR vs. XPEV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 22, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AMCR and XPEV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

AMCR is a standard domestic listing, while XPEV trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	AMCR	XPEV
Company Name	Amcor plc	XPeng Inc.
Country	Switzerland	China
GICS Sector	Materials	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Containers & Packaging	Automobiles
Market Capitalization	19.75 billion USD	18.41 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	May 15, 2012	August 27, 2020
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMCR and XPEV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMCR vs. XPEV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	XPEV
5-Day Price Return	-2.17%	5.11%
13-Week Price Return	-9.22%	1.95%
26-Week Price Return	-15.15%	27.71%
52-Week Price Return	-19.30%	182.92%
Month-to-Date Return	-8.34%	11.86%
Year-to-Date Return	-8.93%	72.33%
10-Day Avg. Volume	34.70M	9.22M
3-Month Avg. Volume	32.25M	7.30M
3-Month Volatility	30.68%	53.41%
Beta	0.75	2.53

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMCR

20.91%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 41.66%
Q3: 20.76%
Median: 14.35%
Q1: 6.55%
Min: 3.64%

In the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, AMCR’s Return on Equity of 20.91% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

XPEV

-15.89%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 25.70%
Q3: 12.88%
Median: 6.92%
Q1: 0.71%
Min: -15.89%

XPEV has a negative Return on Equity of -15.89%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AMCR vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMCR

5.99%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 11.61%
Q3: 8.17%
Median: 4.91%
Q1: 4.20%
Min: 0.08%

AMCR’s Net Profit Margin of 5.99% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

XPEV

-10.15%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 9.92%
Q3: 5.78%
Median: 3.23%
Q1: 0.11%
Min: -5.31%

XPEV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -10.15%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AMCR vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMCR

9.78%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 22.03%
Q3: 13.17%
Median: 8.87%
Q1: 6.86%
Min: 0.07%

AMCR’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.78% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

XPEV

-12.08%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 13.07%
Q3: 7.22%
Median: 5.29%
Q1: 0.43%
Min: -4.46%

XPEV has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.08%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AMCR vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	XPEV
Return on Equity (TTM)	20.91%	-15.89%
Return on Assets (TTM)	4.77%	-6.30%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	5.99%	-10.15%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	9.78%	-12.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	20.00%	16.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

1.70

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 2.13
Q3: 1.57
Median: 1.27
Q1: 1.13
Min: 0.58

AMCR’s Current Ratio of 1.70 is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

XPEV

1.21

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.19
Q3: 1.54
Median: 1.26
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.48

XPEV’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMCR vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

2.28

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.50
Q3: 2.23
Median: 1.22
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.23

AMCR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Containers & Packaging industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.28. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

XPEV

0.42

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.34
Q3: 1.13
Median: 0.58
Q1: 0.28
Min: 0.06

XPEV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMCR vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

3.93

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 13.16
Q3: 8.10
Median: 3.61
Q1: 2.94
Min: 1.06

AMCR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

XPEV

-19.31

Automobiles Industry

Max: 77.87
Q3: 42.86
Median: 13.88
Q1: 2.13
Min: -49.07

XPEV has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -19.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AMCR vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	XPEV
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.70	1.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.02	1.00
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.28	0.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	3.93	-19.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMCR vs. XPEV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMCR vs. XPEV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMCR

3.71%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 7.37%
Q3: 4.07%
Median: 3.33%
Q1: 1.72%
Min: 0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Yield of 3.71% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

XPEV

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 10.71%
Q3: 5.39%
Median: 3.14%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

XPEV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMCR vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

90.46%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 221.20%
Q3: 119.52%
Median: 58.05%
Q1: 28.91%
Min: 0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 90.46% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

XPEV

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 114.43%
Q3: 59.30%
Median: 37.15%
Q1: 16.40%
Min: 0.00%

XPEV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMCR vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	XPEV
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.71%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	90.46%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

24.37

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 35.98
Q3: 27.87
Median: 16.15
Q1: 14.38
Min: 8.20

AMCR’s P/E Ratio of 24.37 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

XPEV

Automobiles Industry

Max: 27.69
Q3: 19.99
Median: 9.85
Q1: 6.60
Min: 4.25

P/E Ratio data for XPEV is currently unavailable.

AMCR vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

1.46

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 2.91
Q3: 1.67
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.64
Min: 0.30

AMCR’s P/S Ratio of 1.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

XPEV

2.45

Automobiles Industry

Max: 1.52
Q3: 0.84
Median: 0.41
Q1: 0.23
Min: 0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 2.45, XPEV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AMCR vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

3.64

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 5.28
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.57
Min: 0.89

AMCR’s P/B Ratio of 3.64 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

XPEV

4.61

Automobiles Industry

Max: 4.25
Q3: 2.00
Median: 0.87
Q1: 0.46
Min: 0.19

At 4.61, XPEV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AMCR vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	XPEV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	24.37	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.46	2.45
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	3.64	4.61
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	16.72	--