Seek Returns logo

AMCR vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMCR and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

VIPS’s market capitalization of 37.80 billion USD is significantly greater than AMCR’s 22.20 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 0.73 for AMCR and 0.56 for VIPS, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

VIPS is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. AMCR, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolAMCRVIPS
Company NameAmcor plcVipshop Holdings Limited
CountryCHCN
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustryPackaging & ContainersSpecialty Retail
CEOPeter Konieczny Dip Eng, MBA, MSc Mech EngYa Shen
Price9.63 USD14.99 USD
Market Cap22.20 billion USD37.80 billion USD
Beta0.730.56
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMay 15, 2012March 23, 2012
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMCR and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMCR vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMCR

11.74%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
20.97%
Q3
18.53%
Median
9.15%
Q1
3.67%
Min
-15.31%

AMCR’s Return on Equity of 11.74% is on par with the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VIPS

18.88%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
70.52%
Q3
29.03%
Median
10.90%
Q1
-7.86%
Min
-57.43%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMCR

4.02%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
11.55%
Q3
9.42%
Median
6.03%
Q1
2.83%
Min
-6.57%

AMCR’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.02% is in line with the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

VIPS

13.41%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
13.75%
Median
8.05%
Q1
0.80%
Min
-17.95%

VIPS’s Return on Invested Capital of 13.41% is in line with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMCR

3.37%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
10.07%
Q3
5.37%
Median
3.61%
Q1
1.49%
Min
-2.97%

AMCR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.37% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VIPS

6.88%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
8.49%
Median
3.43%
Q1
-0.69%
Min
-9.88%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMCR

5.29%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
14.60%
Q3
11.93%
Median
8.05%
Q1
5.47%
Min
2.09%

AMCR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.29% is in the lower quartile for the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

VIPS

8.12%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
24.47%
Q3
11.10%
Median
5.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
-12.62%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.12% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMCRVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)11.74%18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.51%9.88%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.02%13.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.37%6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.29%8.12%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.00%23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMCR

1.70

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.79
Median
1.38
Q1
1.16
Min
0.80

AMCR’s Current Ratio of 1.70 aligns with the median group of the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VIPS

1.28

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.24
Q3
1.99
Median
1.42
Q1
1.02
Min
0.54

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMCR

2.40

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
2.22
Median
1.22
Q1
0.79
Min
0.56

AMCR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Packaging & Containers industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.40. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VIPS

0.13

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.42
Median
0.87
Q1
0.35
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.13 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMCR

2.11

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
6.21
Q3
4.64
Median
2.89
Q1
1.61
Min
-0.51

AMCR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.11 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIPS

151.50

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
17.19
Median
4.28
Q1
0.11
Min
-23.60

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 151.50, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMCRVIPS
Current Ratio (TTM)1.701.28
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.161.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.400.13
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.510.07
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)7.17-2.44
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.11151.50

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMCR and VIPS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMCR

5.27%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
9.30%
Q3
4.22%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.42%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.27%, AMCR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Packaging & Containers industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

VIPS

3.20%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.54%
Q3
1.52%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.20%, VIPS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMCR

161.75%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
223.77%
Q3
154.70%
Median
54.74%
Q1
23.39%
Min
0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 161.75% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

VIPS

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
177.64%
Q3
9.49%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMCRVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.27%3.20%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)161.75%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMCR

30.68

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
57.57
Q3
40.45
Median
25.12
Q1
18.16
Min
10.25

AMCR’s P/E Ratio of 30.68 is within the middle range for the Packaging & Containers industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VIPS

7.48

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
81.45
Q3
42.51
Median
25.40
Q1
12.72
Min
1.88

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.48 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMCR

3.58

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
3.19
Q3
2.69
Median
2.20
Q1
2.02
Min
2.02

AMCR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.58 is exceptionally high for the Packaging & Containers industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

VIPS

-0.07

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
2.79
Median
1.76
Q1
0.69
Min
0.00

VIPS has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -0.07. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMCR

1.65

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.28
Median
0.99
Q1
0.75
Min
0.36

AMCR’s P/S Ratio of 1.65 is in the upper echelon for the Packaging & Containers industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VIPS

2.53

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.26
Q3
2.60
Median
1.29
Q1
0.41
Min
0.06

VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 2.53 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMCR

3.61

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
5.73
Q3
3.44
Median
2.08
Q1
1.76
Min
0.55

AMCR’s P/B Ratio of 3.61 is in the upper tier for the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

VIPS

1.37

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
12.73
Q3
6.96
Median
3.28
Q1
1.42
Min
0.24

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.37 is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMCRVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)30.687.48
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.58-0.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.652.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)3.611.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)20.38--
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)29.2625.99
EV-to-Sales (TTM)2.182.31