AMCR vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 7, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AMCR and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

AMCR is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	AMCR	VIPS
Company Name	Amcor plc	Vipshop Holdings Limited
Country	Switzerland	China
GICS Sector	Materials	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Containers & Packaging	Broadline Retail
Market Capitalization	18.88 billion USD	10.01 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	May 15, 2012	March 23, 2012
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMCR and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMCR vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	VIPS
5-Day Price Return	0.49%	6.34%
13-Week Price Return	-15.06%	35.42%
26-Week Price Return	-15.67%	29.46%
52-Week Price Return	-27.16%	17.34%
Month-to-Date Return	0.00%	3.36%
Year-to-Date Return	-13.07%	50.71%
10-Day Avg. Volume	22.17M	2.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume	24.84M	2.84M
3-Month Volatility	29.35%	29.15%
Beta	0.70	0.76

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMCR

8.78%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 36.99%
Q3: 19.86%
Median: 10.47%
Q1: 6.76%
Min: -0.20%

AMCR’s Return on Equity of 8.78% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VIPS

17.61%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 47.53%
Q3: 31.20%
Median: 16.63%
Q1: 10.81%
Min: -7.57%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 17.61% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMCR

3.40%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 10.84%
Q3: 8.25%
Median: 4.91%
Q1: 3.65%
Min: -0.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, AMCR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.40% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

VIPS

6.53%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 24.63%
Q3: 12.77%
Median: 8.63%
Q1: 4.50%
Min: -1.62%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.53% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMCR

6.72%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 22.03%
Q3: 13.09%
Median: 8.06%
Q1: 6.46%
Min: -0.07%

AMCR’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.72% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VIPS

7.65%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 27.48%
Q3: 17.60%
Median: 10.82%
Q1: 7.76%
Min: -6.73%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.65% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	VIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)	8.78%	17.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.32%	9.47%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	3.40%	6.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	6.72%	7.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	18.88%	23.33%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

1.21

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 1.96
Q3: 1.45
Median: 1.33
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.87

AMCR’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VIPS

1.26

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 3.54
Q3: 2.42
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.69

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

1.20

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.15
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.20
Q1: 0.53
Min: 0.23

AMCR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.20 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VIPS

0.17

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 2.01
Q3: 1.31
Median: 0.72
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

2.87

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 13.16
Q3: 8.10
Median: 3.38
Q1: 2.83
Min: 1.06

AMCR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.87 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 37.34
Q3: 21.16
Median: 8.60
Q1: 3.22
Min: -19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	VIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.21	1.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.61	1.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.20	0.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	2.87	150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMCR vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMCR vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMCR

4.45%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 7.14%
Q3: 4.65%
Median: 3.69%
Q1: 2.00%
Min: 0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Yield of 4.45% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 4.06%
Q3: 2.07%
Median: 0.37%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

90.46%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 222.75%
Q3: 132.16%
Median: 65.79%
Q1: 28.53%
Min: 0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 90.46% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 114.82%
Q3: 62.39%
Median: 28.55%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	VIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	4.45%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	90.46%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

37.18

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 24.22
Q3: 20.28
Median: 17.07
Q1: 15.06
Min: 7.79

At 37.18, AMCR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

VIPS

10.35

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 62.76
Q3: 32.50
Median: 17.65
Q1: 12.08
Min: 6.87

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 10.35 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

1.27

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 1.99
Q3: 1.17
Median: 0.94
Q1: 0.55
Min: 0.31

AMCR’s P/S Ratio of 1.27 is in the upper echelon for the Containers & Packaging industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VIPS

0.68

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 5.19
Q3: 3.25
Median: 2.13
Q1: 1.01
Min: 0.21

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.68 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

1.81

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.79
Q3: 3.32
Median: 2.14
Q1: 1.60
Min: 0.89

AMCR’s P/B Ratio of 1.81 is within the conventional range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VIPS

1.40

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 8.81
Q3: 5.19
Median: 3.42
Q1: 1.75
Min: 0.73

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AMCR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	VIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	37.18	10.35
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.27	0.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.81	1.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	15.52	--