Seek Returns logo

AMCR vs. VIK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMCR and VIK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMCR’s market capitalization stands at 22.20 billion USD, while VIK’s is 24.58 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

VIK carries a higher beta at 2.21, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AMCR (beta: 0.73) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAMCRVIK
Company NameAmcor plcViking Holdings Ltd
CountryCHBM
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustryPackaging & ContainersTravel Services
CEOPeter Konieczny Dip Eng, MBA, MSc Mech EngTorstein Hagen
Price9.63 USD55.46 USD
Market Cap22.20 billion USD24.58 billion USD
Beta0.732.21
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMay 15, 2012June 14, 2010
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMCR and VIK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMCR vs. VIK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMCR

11.74%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
20.97%
Q3
18.53%
Median
9.15%
Q1
3.67%
Min
-15.31%

AMCR’s Return on Equity of 11.74% is on par with the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VIK

-87.88%

Travel Services Industry

Max
73.02%
Q3
34.55%
Median
12.42%
Q1
-4.86%
Min
-43.74%

VIK has a negative Return on Equity of -87.88%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AMCR vs. VIK: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMCR

4.02%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
11.55%
Q3
9.42%
Median
6.03%
Q1
2.83%
Min
-6.57%

AMCR’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.02% is in line with the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

VIK

20.68%

Travel Services Industry

Max
20.68%
Q3
16.03%
Median
10.02%
Q1
6.13%
Min
3.60%

In the upper quartile for the Travel Services industry, VIK’s Return on Invested Capital of 20.68% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AMCR vs. VIK: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMCR

3.37%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
10.07%
Q3
5.37%
Median
3.61%
Q1
1.49%
Min
-2.97%

AMCR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.37% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VIK

9.82%

Travel Services Industry

Max
30.84%
Q3
20.18%
Median
9.77%
Q1
7.81%
Min
-5.69%

VIK’s Net Profit Margin of 9.82% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Travel Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. VIK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMCR

5.29%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
14.60%
Q3
11.93%
Median
8.05%
Q1
5.47%
Min
2.09%

AMCR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.29% is in the lower quartile for the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

VIK

20.61%

Travel Services Industry

Max
32.49%
Q3
23.05%
Median
17.29%
Q1
11.44%
Min
3.62%

VIK’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.61% is around the midpoint for the Travel Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. VIK: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMCRVIK
Return on Equity (TTM)11.74%-87.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.51%5.06%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.02%20.68%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.37%9.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.29%20.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.00%40.77%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMCR

1.70

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.79
Median
1.38
Q1
1.16
Min
0.80

AMCR’s Current Ratio of 1.70 aligns with the median group of the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VIK

0.63

Travel Services Industry

Max
1.90
Q3
1.56
Median
1.16
Q1
0.68
Min
0.18

VIK’s Current Ratio of 0.63 falls into the lower quartile for the Travel Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AMCR vs. VIK: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMCR

2.40

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
2.22
Median
1.22
Q1
0.79
Min
0.56

AMCR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Packaging & Containers industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.40. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VIK

-20.41

Travel Services Industry

Max
2.53
Q3
2.25
Median
1.87
Q1
0.29
Min
0.20

VIK has a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of -20.41, which indicates negative shareholder equity where liabilities exceed assets. This is a critical sign of financial distress.

AMCR vs. VIK: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMCR

2.11

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
6.21
Q3
4.64
Median
2.89
Q1
1.61
Min
-0.51

AMCR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.11 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIK

3.28

Travel Services Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
6.06
Median
3.05
Q1
2.58
Min
0.53

VIK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.28 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Travel Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMCR vs. VIK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMCRVIK
Current Ratio (TTM)1.700.63
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.160.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.40-20.41
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.510.52
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)7.172.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.113.28

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMCR and VIK. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMCR vs. VIK: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMCR vs. VIK: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMCR vs. VIK: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMCR

5.27%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
9.30%
Q3
4.22%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.42%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.27%, AMCR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Packaging & Containers industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

VIK

0.00%

Travel Services Industry

Max
4.09%
Q3
0.54%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMCR vs. VIK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMCR

161.75%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
223.77%
Q3
154.70%
Median
54.74%
Q1
23.39%
Min
0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 161.75% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

VIK

3.66%

Travel Services Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
4.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.66% is within the typical range for the Travel Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMCR vs. VIK: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMCRVIK
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.27%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)161.75%3.66%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMCR

30.68

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
57.57
Q3
40.45
Median
25.12
Q1
18.16
Min
10.25

AMCR’s P/E Ratio of 30.68 is within the middle range for the Packaging & Containers industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VIK

45.40

Travel Services Industry

Max
43.15
Q3
34.01
Median
22.22
Q1
16.56
Min
9.02

At 45.40, VIK’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Travel Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AMCR vs. VIK: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMCR

3.58

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
3.19
Q3
2.69
Median
2.20
Q1
2.02
Min
2.02

AMCR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.58 is exceptionally high for the Packaging & Containers industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

VIK

2.15

Travel Services Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.61
Median
1.00
Q1
0.54
Min
0.02

A Forward PEG Ratio of 2.15 places VIK in the upper quartile for the Travel Services industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

AMCR vs. VIK: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMCR

1.65

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.28
Median
0.99
Q1
0.75
Min
0.36

AMCR’s P/S Ratio of 1.65 is in the upper echelon for the Packaging & Containers industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VIK

4.46

Travel Services Industry

Max
7.69
Q3
5.64
Median
2.87
Q1
0.93
Min
0.41

VIK’s P/S Ratio of 4.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Travel Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMCR vs. VIK: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMCR

3.61

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
5.73
Q3
3.44
Median
2.08
Q1
1.76
Min
0.55

AMCR’s P/B Ratio of 3.61 is in the upper tier for the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

VIK

-90.57

Travel Services Industry

Max
10.52
Q3
10.49
Median
9.35
Q1
4.57
Min
1.91

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Travel Services industry.

AMCR vs. VIK: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMCRVIK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)30.6845.40
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.582.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.654.46
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)3.61-90.57
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)20.3820.59
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)29.2623.36
EV-to-Sales (TTM)2.184.96