AMCR vs. ULTA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on July 7, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AMCR and ULTA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMCR’s market capitalization stands at 22.20 billion USD, while ULTA’s is 21.47 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 0.73 for AMCR and 1.10 for ULTA, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

Symbol	AMCR	ULTA
Company Name	Amcor plc	Ulta Beauty, Inc.
Country	CH	US
Sector	Consumer Cyclical	Consumer Cyclical
Industry	Packaging & Containers	Specialty Retail
CEO	Peter Konieczny Dip Eng, MBA, MSc Mech Eng	Kecia L. Steelman
Price	9.63 USD	477.79 USD
Market Cap	22.20 billion USD	21.47 billion USD
Beta	0.73	1.10
Exchange	NYSE	NASDAQ
IPO Date	May 15, 2012	October 25, 2007
ADR	No	No

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMCR and ULTA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMCR vs. ULTA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMCR

11.74%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 20.97%
Q3: 18.53%
Median: 9.15%
Q1: 3.67%
Min: -15.31%

AMCR’s Return on Equity of 11.74% is on par with the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ULTA

49.73%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 70.52%
Q3: 29.03%
Median: 10.90%
Q1: -7.86%
Min: -57.43%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, ULTA’s Return on Equity of 49.73% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AMCR vs. ULTA: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMCR

4.02%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 11.55%
Q3: 9.42%
Median: 6.03%
Q1: 2.83%
Min: -6.57%

AMCR’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.02% is in line with the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ULTA

26.28%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 29.46%
Q3: 13.75%
Median: 8.05%
Q1: 0.80%
Min: -17.95%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, ULTA’s Return on Invested Capital of 26.28% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AMCR vs. ULTA: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMCR

3.37%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 10.07%
Q3: 5.37%
Median: 3.61%
Q1: 1.49%
Min: -2.97%

AMCR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.37% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ULTA

10.45%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 19.78%
Q3: 8.49%
Median: 3.43%
Q1: -0.69%
Min: -9.88%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.45% places ULTA in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AMCR vs. ULTA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMCR

5.29%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 14.60%
Q3: 11.93%
Median: 8.05%
Q1: 5.47%
Min: 2.09%

AMCR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.29% is in the lower quartile for the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ULTA

13.71%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 24.47%
Q3: 11.10%
Median: 5.85%
Q1: 0.66%
Min: -12.62%

An Operating Profit Margin of 13.71% places ULTA in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AMCR vs. ULTA: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	ULTA
Return on Equity (TTM)	11.74%	49.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.51%	19.93%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)	4.02%	26.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	3.37%	10.45%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	5.29%	13.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	20.00%	38.81%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMCR

1.70

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 1.88
Q3: 1.79
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.16
Min: 0.80

AMCR’s Current Ratio of 1.70 aligns with the median group of the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ULTA

1.67

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 3.24
Q3: 1.99
Median: 1.42
Q1: 1.02
Min: 0.54

ULTA’s Current Ratio of 1.67 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMCR vs. ULTA: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMCR

2.40

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 2.47
Q3: 2.22
Median: 1.22
Q1: 0.79
Min: 0.56

AMCR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Packaging & Containers industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.40. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ULTA

0.81

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 2.72
Q3: 1.42
Median: 0.87
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.01

ULTA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.81 is typical for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMCR vs. ULTA: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMCR

2.11

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 6.21
Q3: 4.64
Median: 2.89
Q1: 1.61
Min: -0.51

AMCR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.11 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ULTA

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 37.34
Q3: 17.19
Median: 4.28
Q1: 0.11
Min: -23.60

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ULTA is currently unavailable.

AMCR vs. ULTA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	ULTA
Current Ratio (TTM)	1.70	1.67
Quick Ratio (TTM)	1.16	0.46
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)	2.40	0.81
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)	0.51	0.33
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)	7.17	0.82
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	2.11	--

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMCR and ULTA. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMCR vs. ULTA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMCR vs. ULTA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMCR vs. ULTA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMCR

5.27%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 9.30%
Q3: 4.22%
Median: 2.67%
Q1: 1.42%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.27%, AMCR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Packaging & Containers industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ULTA

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 5.54%
Q3: 1.52%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ULTA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMCR vs. ULTA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMCR

161.75%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 223.77%
Q3: 154.70%
Median: 54.74%
Q1: 23.39%
Min: 0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 161.75% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

ULTA

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 177.64%
Q3: 9.49%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ULTA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMCR vs. ULTA: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	ULTA
Dividend Yield (TTM)	5.27%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	161.75%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMCR

30.68

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 57.57
Q3: 40.45
Median: 25.12
Q1: 18.16
Min: 10.25

AMCR’s P/E Ratio of 30.68 is within the middle range for the Packaging & Containers industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ULTA

18.17

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 81.45
Q3: 42.51
Median: 25.40
Q1: 12.72
Min: 1.88

ULTA’s P/E Ratio of 18.17 is within the middle range for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMCR vs. ULTA: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMCR

3.58

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 3.19
Q3: 2.69
Median: 2.20
Q1: 2.02
Min: 2.02

AMCR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.58 is exceptionally high for the Packaging & Containers industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

ULTA

1.52

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 5.90
Q3: 2.79
Median: 1.76
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.00

ULTA’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.52 is within the middle range of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AMCR vs. ULTA: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMCR

1.65

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 1.99
Q3: 1.28
Median: 0.99
Q1: 0.75
Min: 0.36

AMCR’s P/S Ratio of 1.65 is in the upper echelon for the Packaging & Containers industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ULTA

1.88

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 5.26
Q3: 2.60
Median: 1.29
Q1: 0.41
Min: 0.06

ULTA’s P/S Ratio of 1.88 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMCR vs. ULTA: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMCR

3.61

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 5.73
Q3: 3.44
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.76
Min: 0.55

AMCR’s P/B Ratio of 3.61 is in the upper tier for the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ULTA

8.92

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 12.73
Q3: 6.96
Median: 3.28
Q1: 1.42
Min: 0.24

ULTA’s P/B Ratio of 8.92 is in the upper tier for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AMCR vs. ULTA: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	ULTA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)	30.68	18.17
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)	3.58	1.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)	1.65	1.88
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)	3.61	8.92
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)	20.38	20.71
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)	29.26	12.41
EV-to-Sales (TTM)	2.18	2.01