Seek Returns logo

AMCR vs. SBUX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMCR and SBUX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMCRSBUX
Company NameAmcor plcStarbucks Corporation
CountrySwitzerlandUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization19.75 billion USD101.75 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 15, 2012June 26, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMCR and SBUX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMCR vs. SBUX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMCRSBUX
5-Day Price Return-2.17%-3.81%
13-Week Price Return-9.22%5.79%
26-Week Price Return-15.15%-20.79%
52-Week Price Return-19.30%-3.02%
Month-to-Date Return-8.34%0.39%
Year-to-Date Return-8.93%-1.91%
10-Day Avg. Volume34.70M8.15M
3-Month Avg. Volume32.25M10.26M
3-Month Volatility30.68%27.77%
Beta0.751.02

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMCR

20.91%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

In the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, AMCR’s Return on Equity of 20.91% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SBUX

115.68%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

SBUX’s Return on Equity of 115.68% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AMCR vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMCR

5.99%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

AMCR’s Net Profit Margin of 5.99% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SBUX

7.18%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

SBUX’s Net Profit Margin of 7.18% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMCR

9.78%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

AMCR’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.78% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SBUX

10.81%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

SBUX’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.81% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMCRSBUX
Return on Equity (TTM)20.91%115.68%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.77%8.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.99%7.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.78%10.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.00%23.74%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

1.70

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

AMCR’s Current Ratio of 1.70 is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

SBUX

0.76

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

SBUX’s Current Ratio of 0.76 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMCR vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

2.28

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

AMCR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Containers & Packaging industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.28. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SBUX

8.07

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

SBUX’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.07. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AMCR vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

3.93

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

AMCR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SBUX

37.01

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 37.01, SBUX demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AMCR vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMCRSBUX
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.700.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.020.52
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.288.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.9337.01

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMCR vs. SBUX: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMCR vs. SBUX: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMCR

3.71%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Yield of 3.71% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SBUX

2.66%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.66%, SBUX offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AMCR vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

90.46%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 90.46% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SBUX

103.48%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SBUX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 103.48% is in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AMCR vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMCRSBUX
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.71%2.66%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)90.46%103.48%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

24.37

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

AMCR’s P/E Ratio of 24.37 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SBUX

38.96

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

A P/E Ratio of 38.96 places SBUX in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AMCR vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

1.46

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

AMCR’s P/S Ratio of 1.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SBUX

2.80

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

SBUX’s P/S Ratio of 2.80 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMCR vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

3.64

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

AMCR’s P/B Ratio of 3.64 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SBUX

64.12

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 64.12, SBUX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AMCR vs. SBUX: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMCRSBUX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.3738.96
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.462.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.6464.12
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.7240.21