Seek Returns logo

AMCR vs. ROL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMCR and ROL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMCRROL
Company NameAmcor plcRollins, Inc.
CountrySwitzerlandUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization18.40 billion USD28.17 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 15, 2012March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMCR and ROL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMCR vs. ROL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMCRROL
5-Day Price Return-3.16%-0.33%
13-Week Price Return-18.67%4.14%
26-Week Price Return-16.72%3.97%
52-Week Price Return-28.26%19.34%
Month-to-Date Return-2.57%-1.06%
Year-to-Date Return-15.30%25.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume17.75M1.78M
3-Month Avg. Volume24.22M1.63M
3-Month Volatility29.27%19.55%
Beta0.710.79

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMCR

8.78%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

AMCR’s Return on Equity of 8.78% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ROL

35.93%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

ROL’s Return on Equity of 35.93% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AMCR vs. ROL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMCR

3.40%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, AMCR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.40% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ROL

13.70%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.70% places ROL in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AMCR vs. ROL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMCR

6.72%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

AMCR’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.72% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ROL

19.14%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.14% places ROL in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AMCR vs. ROL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMCRROL
Return on Equity (TTM)8.78%35.93%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.32%16.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.40%13.70%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.72%19.14%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)18.88%52.69%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

1.21

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

AMCR’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ROL

0.68

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

ROL’s Current Ratio of 0.68 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AMCR vs. ROL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

1.20

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

AMCR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.20 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ROL

0.38

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

ROL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMCR vs. ROL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

2.87

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

AMCR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.87 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ROL

23.77

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

ROL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.77 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AMCR vs. ROL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMCRROL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.210.68
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.610.63
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.200.38
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.8723.77

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMCR vs. ROL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMCR vs. ROL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMCR

4.60%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Yield of 4.60% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ROL

1.12%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

ROL’s Dividend Yield of 1.12% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AMCR vs. ROL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

90.46%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 90.46% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ROL

63.80%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

ROL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.80% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMCR vs. ROL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMCRROL
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.60%1.12%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)90.46%63.80%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

35.96

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

At 35.96, AMCR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ROL

57.21

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

A P/E Ratio of 57.21 places ROL in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AMCR vs. ROL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

1.22

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

AMCR’s P/S Ratio of 1.22 is in the upper echelon for the Containers & Packaging industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ROL

7.84

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

With a P/S Ratio of 7.84, ROL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AMCR vs. ROL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

1.81

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

AMCR’s P/B Ratio of 1.81 is within the conventional range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ROL

18.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

At 18.94, ROL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AMCR vs. ROL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMCRROL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.9657.21
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.227.84
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.8118.94
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.0144.32