Seek Returns logo

AMCR vs. PHM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMCR and PHM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMCR’s market capitalization stands at 22.20 billion USD, while PHM’s is 21.92 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

PHM carries a higher beta at 1.30, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AMCR (beta: 0.73) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAMCRPHM
Company NameAmcor plcPulteGroup, Inc.
CountryCHUS
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustryPackaging & ContainersResidential Construction
CEOPeter Konieczny Dip Eng, MBA, MSc Mech EngRyan R. Marshall
Price9.63 USD109.36 USD
Market Cap22.20 billion USD21.92 billion USD
Beta0.731.30
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMay 15, 2012March 17, 1980
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMCR and PHM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMCR vs. PHM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMCR

11.74%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
20.97%
Q3
18.53%
Median
9.15%
Q1
3.67%
Min
-15.31%

AMCR’s Return on Equity of 11.74% is on par with the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PHM

24.94%

Residential Construction Industry

Max
38.32%
Q3
24.08%
Median
16.46%
Q1
12.92%
Min
7.81%

In the upper quartile for the Residential Construction industry, PHM’s Return on Equity of 24.94% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AMCR vs. PHM: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Packaging & Containers and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMCR

4.02%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
11.55%
Q3
9.42%
Median
6.03%
Q1
2.83%
Min
-6.57%

AMCR’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.02% is in line with the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

PHM

23.25%

Residential Construction Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
12.67%
Median
11.66%
Q1
8.04%
Min
3.73%

PHM’s Return on Invested Capital of 23.25% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Residential Construction industry. This demonstrates an outstanding ability to deploy capital efficiently and create significant value.

AMCR vs. PHM: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Packaging & Containers and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMCR

3.37%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
10.07%
Q3
5.37%
Median
3.61%
Q1
1.49%
Min
-2.97%

AMCR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.37% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PHM

16.45%

Residential Construction Industry

Max
17.37%
Q3
12.35%
Median
10.36%
Q1
8.29%
Min
3.91%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.45% places PHM in the upper quartile for the Residential Construction industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AMCR vs. PHM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Packaging & Containers and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMCR

5.29%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
14.60%
Q3
11.93%
Median
8.05%
Q1
5.47%
Min
2.09%

AMCR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.29% is in the lower quartile for the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

PHM

21.58%

Residential Construction Industry

Max
22.34%
Q3
15.74%
Median
12.30%
Q1
9.51%
Min
4.20%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.58% places PHM in the upper quartile for the Residential Construction industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AMCR vs. PHM: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Packaging & Containers and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMCRPHM
Return on Equity (TTM)11.74%24.94%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.51%16.98%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.02%23.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.37%16.45%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.29%21.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.00%29.17%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMCR

1.70

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.79
Median
1.38
Q1
1.16
Min
0.80

AMCR’s Current Ratio of 1.70 aligns with the median group of the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PHM

4.83

Residential Construction Industry

Max
26.19
Q3
13.52
Median
7.75
Q1
3.72
Min
1.49

PHM’s Current Ratio of 4.83 aligns with the median group of the Residential Construction industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMCR vs. PHM: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMCR

2.40

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
2.22
Median
1.22
Q1
0.79
Min
0.56

AMCR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Packaging & Containers industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.40. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PHM

0.17

Residential Construction Industry

Max
0.60
Q3
0.40
Median
0.33
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

PHM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 is typical for the Residential Construction industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMCR vs. PHM: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMCR

2.11

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
6.21
Q3
4.64
Median
2.89
Q1
1.61
Min
-0.51

AMCR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.11 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PHM

10,404.37

Residential Construction Industry

Max
137.53
Q3
119.57
Median
59.70
Q1
34.03
Min
10.68

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 10,404.37, PHM demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Residential Construction industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AMCR vs. PHM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Packaging & Containers and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMCRPHM
Current Ratio (TTM)1.704.83
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.160.43
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.400.17
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.510.12
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)7.170.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.1110404.37

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMCR and PHM. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMCR vs. PHM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMCR vs. PHM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMCR vs. PHM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMCR

5.27%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
9.30%
Q3
4.22%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.42%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.27%, AMCR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Packaging & Containers industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

PHM

0.79%

Residential Construction Industry

Max
2.41%
Q3
1.31%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHM’s Dividend Yield of 0.79% is consistent with its peers in the Residential Construction industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AMCR vs. PHM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Packaging & Containers and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMCR

161.75%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
223.77%
Q3
154.70%
Median
54.74%
Q1
23.39%
Min
0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 161.75% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

PHM

5.80%

Residential Construction Industry

Max
35.19%
Q3
10.57%
Median
2.40%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.80% is within the typical range for the Residential Construction industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMCR vs. PHM: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMCRPHM
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.27%0.79%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)161.75%5.80%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMCR

30.68

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
57.57
Q3
40.45
Median
25.12
Q1
18.16
Min
10.25

AMCR’s P/E Ratio of 30.68 is within the middle range for the Packaging & Containers industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PHM

7.51

Residential Construction Industry

Max
9.55
Q3
9.42
Median
7.20
Q1
6.63
Min
3.19

PHM’s P/E Ratio of 7.51 is within the middle range for the Residential Construction industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMCR vs. PHM: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMCR

3.58

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
3.19
Q3
2.69
Median
2.20
Q1
2.02
Min
2.02

AMCR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.58 is exceptionally high for the Packaging & Containers industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

PHM

0.50

Residential Construction Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.05
Median
0.49
Q1
0.25
Min
0.10

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Residential Construction industry.

AMCR vs. PHM: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMCR

1.65

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.28
Median
0.99
Q1
0.75
Min
0.36

AMCR’s P/S Ratio of 1.65 is in the upper echelon for the Packaging & Containers industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PHM

1.23

Residential Construction Industry

Max
2.31
Q3
1.33
Median
0.79
Q1
0.56
Min
0.20

PHM’s P/S Ratio of 1.23 aligns with the market consensus for the Residential Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMCR vs. PHM: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMCR

3.61

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
5.73
Q3
3.44
Median
2.08
Q1
1.76
Min
0.55

AMCR’s P/B Ratio of 3.61 is in the upper tier for the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PHM

1.80

Residential Construction Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.66
Median
1.08
Q1
0.86
Min
0.55

PHM’s P/B Ratio of 1.80 is in the upper tier for the Residential Construction industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AMCR vs. PHM: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMCRPHM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)30.687.51
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.580.50
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.651.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)3.611.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)20.3815.10
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)29.265.74
EV-to-Sales (TTM)2.181.27