AMCR vs. NCLH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on July 8, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AMCR and NCLH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMCR’s market capitalization of 22.20 billion USD is substantially larger than NCLH’s 9.82 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

NCLH carries a higher beta at 2.13, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AMCR (beta: 0.73) exhibits greater stability.

Symbol	AMCR	NCLH
Company Name	Amcor plc	Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
Country	CH	US
Sector	Consumer Cyclical	Consumer Cyclical
Industry	Packaging & Containers	Travel Services
CEO	Peter Konieczny Dip Eng, MBA, MSc Mech Eng	Harry J. Sommer
Price	9.63 USD	21.98 USD
Market Cap	22.20 billion USD	9.82 billion USD
Beta	0.73	2.13
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
IPO Date	May 15, 2012	January 18, 2013
ADR	No	No

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMCR and NCLH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMCR vs. NCLH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMCR

11.74%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 20.97%
Q3: 18.53%
Median: 9.15%
Q1: 3.67%
Min: -15.31%

AMCR’s Return on Equity of 11.74% is on par with the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NCLH

73.02%

Travel Services Industry

Max: 73.02%
Q3: 34.55%
Median: 12.42%
Q1: -4.86%
Min: -43.74%

In the upper quartile for the Travel Services industry, NCLH’s Return on Equity of 73.02% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AMCR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMCR

4.02%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 11.55%
Q3: 9.42%
Median: 6.03%
Q1: 2.83%
Min: -6.57%

AMCR’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.02% is in line with the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

NCLH

10.65%

Travel Services Industry

Max: 20.68%
Q3: 16.03%
Median: 10.02%
Q1: 6.13%
Min: 3.60%

NCLH’s Return on Invested Capital of 10.65% is in line with the norm for the Travel Services industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AMCR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMCR

3.37%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 10.07%
Q3: 5.37%
Median: 3.61%
Q1: 1.49%
Min: -2.97%

AMCR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.37% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NCLH

9.05%

Travel Services Industry

Max: 30.84%
Q3: 20.18%
Median: 9.77%
Q1: 7.81%
Min: -5.69%

NCLH’s Net Profit Margin of 9.05% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Travel Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMCR

5.29%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 14.60%
Q3: 11.93%
Median: 8.05%
Q1: 5.47%
Min: 2.09%

AMCR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.29% is in the lower quartile for the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

NCLH

15.50%

Travel Services Industry

Max: 32.49%
Q3: 23.05%
Median: 17.29%
Q1: 11.44%
Min: 3.62%

NCLH’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.50% is around the midpoint for the Travel Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	NCLH
Return on Equity (TTM)	11.74%	73.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.51%	3.99%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)	4.02%	10.65%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	3.37%	9.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	5.29%	15.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	20.00%	38.23%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMCR

1.70

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 1.88
Q3: 1.79
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.16
Min: 0.80

AMCR’s Current Ratio of 1.70 aligns with the median group of the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NCLH

0.19

Travel Services Industry

Max: 1.90
Q3: 1.56
Median: 1.16
Q1: 0.68
Min: 0.18

NCLH’s Current Ratio of 0.19 falls into the lower quartile for the Travel Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AMCR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMCR

2.40

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 2.47
Q3: 2.22
Median: 1.22
Q1: 0.79
Min: 0.56

AMCR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Packaging & Containers industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.40. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

NCLH

9.88

Travel Services Industry

Max: 2.53
Q3: 2.25
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.20

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 9.88, NCLH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Travel Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AMCR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMCR

2.11

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 6.21
Q3: 4.64
Median: 2.89
Q1: 1.61
Min: -0.51

AMCR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.11 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NCLH

2.76

Travel Services Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 6.06
Median: 3.05
Q1: 2.58
Min: 0.53

NCLH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Travel Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMCR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	NCLH
Current Ratio (TTM)	1.70	0.19
Quick Ratio (TTM)	1.16	0.16
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)	2.40	9.88
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)	0.51	0.66
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)	7.17	7.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	2.11	2.76

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMCR and NCLH. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMCR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMCR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMCR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMCR

5.27%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 9.30%
Q3: 4.22%
Median: 2.67%
Q1: 1.42%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.27%, AMCR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Packaging & Containers industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

NCLH

0.00%

Travel Services Industry

Max: 4.09%
Q3: 0.54%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

NCLH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMCR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMCR

161.75%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 223.77%
Q3: 154.70%
Median: 54.74%
Q1: 23.39%
Min: 0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 161.75% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

NCLH

0.00%

Travel Services Industry

Max: 37.56%
Q3: 4.41%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

NCLH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMCR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	NCLH
Dividend Yield (TTM)	5.27%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	161.75%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMCR

30.68

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 57.57
Q3: 40.45
Median: 25.12
Q1: 18.16
Min: 10.25

AMCR’s P/E Ratio of 30.68 is within the middle range for the Packaging & Containers industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NCLH

11.37

Travel Services Industry

Max: 43.15
Q3: 34.01
Median: 22.22
Q1: 16.56
Min: 9.02

In the lower quartile for the Travel Services industry, NCLH’s P/E Ratio of 11.37 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AMCR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMCR

3.58

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 3.19
Q3: 2.69
Median: 2.20
Q1: 2.02
Min: 2.02

AMCR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.58 is exceptionally high for the Packaging & Containers industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

NCLH

0.60

Travel Services Industry

Max: 2.37
Q3: 1.61
Median: 1.00
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.02

NCLH’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.60 is within the middle range of its peers in the Travel Services industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AMCR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMCR

1.65

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 1.99
Q3: 1.28
Median: 0.99
Q1: 0.75
Min: 0.36

AMCR’s P/S Ratio of 1.65 is in the upper echelon for the Packaging & Containers industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NCLH

1.04

Travel Services Industry

Max: 7.69
Q3: 5.64
Median: 2.87
Q1: 0.93
Min: 0.41

NCLH’s P/S Ratio of 1.04 aligns with the market consensus for the Travel Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMCR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMCR

3.61

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 5.73
Q3: 3.44
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.76
Min: 0.55

AMCR’s P/B Ratio of 3.61 is in the upper tier for the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

NCLH

6.85

Travel Services Industry

Max: 10.52
Q3: 10.49
Median: 9.35
Q1: 4.57
Min: 1.91

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Travel Services industry.

AMCR vs. NCLH: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Travel Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	NCLH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)	30.68	11.37
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)	3.58	0.60
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)	1.65	1.04
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)	3.61	6.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)	20.38	-17.68
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)	29.26	12.03
EV-to-Sales (TTM)	2.18	2.51