AMCR vs. NCLH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMCR and NCLH, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMCR dominates in value with a market cap of 21.16 billion USD, eclipsing NCLH’s 7.69 billion USD by roughly 2.75×.
NCLH carries a higher beta at 2.10, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AMCR remains steadier at 0.78.
| Symbol | AMCR | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Amcor plc | Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. |
| Country | CH | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Travel Services |
| CEO | Mr. Peter Konieczny Dip Eng, MBA, MSc Mech Eng | Mr. Harry J. Sommer |
| Price | 9.18 USD | 17.22 USD |
| Market Cap | 21.16 billion USD | 7.69 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.78 | 2.10 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | May 15, 2012 | January 18, 2013 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMCR and NCLH over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AMCR and NCLH based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- NCLH reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -13.85, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AMCR at 19.42 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | AMCR | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.24 | 8.91 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.91 | 0.48 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.08 | 0.82 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 3.44 | 5.36 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 19.42 | -13.85 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 28.40 | 10.95 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.13 | 2.28 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 26.03 | -38.71 |
Dividend Comparison
AMCR delivers a 5.53% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas NCLH appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | AMCR | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 5.53% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMCR and NCLH, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- NCLH’s current ratio of 0.19 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AMCR at 1.70 maintains healthy liquidity.
- NCLH posts a quick ratio of 0.16, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AMCR at 1.16 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- NCLH is highly leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 9.88), elevating both potential gains and risks, compared to AMCR at 2.40, which maintains a steadier capital structure.
| Symbol | AMCR | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.70 | 0.19 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.16 | 0.16 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 2.40 | 9.88 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 0.66 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 8.38 | 2.76 |