Seek Returns logo

AMCR vs. LVS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMCR and LVS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

LVS’s market capitalization of 34.07 billion USD is significantly greater than AMCR’s 22.20 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 0.73 for AMCR and 1.02 for LVS, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAMCRLVS
Company NameAmcor plcLas Vegas Sands Corp.
CountryCHUS
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustryPackaging & ContainersGambling, Resorts & Casinos
CEOPeter Konieczny Dip Eng, MBA, MSc Mech EngRobert Glen Goldstein
Price9.63 USD48.22 USD
Market Cap22.20 billion USD34.07 billion USD
Beta0.731.02
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMay 15, 2012December 15, 2004
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMCR and LVS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMCR vs. LVS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMCR

11.74%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
20.97%
Q3
18.53%
Median
9.15%
Q1
3.67%
Min
-15.31%

AMCR’s Return on Equity of 11.74% is on par with the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LVS

40.87%

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry

Max
78.31%
Q3
30.92%
Median
11.51%
Q1
-3.76%
Min
-37.44%

In the upper quartile for the Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry, LVS’s Return on Equity of 40.87% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AMCR vs. LVS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Packaging & Containers and Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMCR

4.02%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
11.55%
Q3
9.42%
Median
6.03%
Q1
2.83%
Min
-6.57%

AMCR’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.02% is in line with the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

LVS

11.08%

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry

Max
22.28%
Q3
12.49%
Median
8.30%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-3.66%

LVS’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.08% is in line with the norm for the Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AMCR vs. LVS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Packaging & Containers and Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMCR

3.37%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
10.07%
Q3
5.37%
Median
3.61%
Q1
1.49%
Min
-2.97%

AMCR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.37% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LVS

11.64%

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry

Max
15.15%
Q3
10.36%
Median
4.33%
Q1
1.08%
Min
-7.97%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.64% places LVS in the upper quartile for the Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AMCR vs. LVS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Packaging & Containers and Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMCR

5.29%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
14.60%
Q3
11.93%
Median
8.05%
Q1
5.47%
Min
2.09%

AMCR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.29% is in the lower quartile for the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LVS

20.65%

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry

Max
29.13%
Q3
21.80%
Median
14.93%
Q1
6.67%
Min
-10.33%

LVS’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.65% is around the midpoint for the Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. LVS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Packaging & Containers and Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMCRLVS
Return on Equity (TTM)11.74%40.87%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.51%6.14%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.02%11.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.37%11.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.29%20.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.00%45.62%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMCR

1.70

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.79
Median
1.38
Q1
1.16
Min
0.80

AMCR’s Current Ratio of 1.70 aligns with the median group of the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LVS

0.59

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry

Max
2.48
Q3
1.57
Median
1.08
Q1
0.82
Min
0.53

LVS’s Current Ratio of 0.59 falls into the lower quartile for the Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AMCR vs. LVS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMCR

2.40

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
2.22
Median
1.22
Q1
0.79
Min
0.56

AMCR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Packaging & Containers industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.40. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LVS

5.13

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry

Max
6.19
Q3
4.56
Median
2.20
Q1
0.47
Min
0.03

LVS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 5.13. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AMCR vs. LVS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMCR

2.11

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
6.21
Q3
4.64
Median
2.89
Q1
1.61
Min
-0.51

AMCR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.11 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LVS

3.22

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry

Max
5.12
Q3
3.39
Median
2.46
Q1
1.34
Min
-0.76

LVS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMCR vs. LVS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Packaging & Containers and Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMCRLVS
Current Ratio (TTM)1.700.59
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.160.59
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.405.13
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.510.65
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)7.172.70
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.113.22

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMCR and LVS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMCR vs. LVS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMCR vs. LVS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMCR vs. LVS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMCR

5.27%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
9.30%
Q3
4.22%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.42%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.27%, AMCR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Packaging & Containers industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LVS

1.87%

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry

Max
5.65%
Q3
1.71%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.87%, LVS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AMCR vs. LVS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Packaging & Containers and Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMCR

161.75%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
223.77%
Q3
154.70%
Median
54.74%
Q1
23.39%
Min
0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 161.75% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

LVS

47.39%

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry

Max
248.00%
Q3
26.55%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LVS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 47.39% is in the upper quartile for the Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AMCR vs. LVS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMCRLVS
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.27%1.87%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)161.75%47.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMCR

30.68

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
57.57
Q3
40.45
Median
25.12
Q1
18.16
Min
10.25

AMCR’s P/E Ratio of 30.68 is within the middle range for the Packaging & Containers industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LVS

26.33

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
25.05
Median
21.63
Q1
14.56
Min
10.20

A P/E Ratio of 26.33 places LVS in the upper quartile for the Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AMCR vs. LVS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMCR

3.58

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
3.19
Q3
2.69
Median
2.20
Q1
2.02
Min
2.02

AMCR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.58 is exceptionally high for the Packaging & Containers industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

LVS

3.09

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.83
Median
1.76
Q1
0.98
Min
0.06

A Forward PEG Ratio of 3.09 places LVS in the upper quartile for the Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

AMCR vs. LVS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMCR

1.65

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.28
Median
0.99
Q1
0.75
Min
0.36

AMCR’s P/S Ratio of 1.65 is in the upper echelon for the Packaging & Containers industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LVS

3.04

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.74
Median
1.62
Q1
0.79
Min
0.14

LVS’s P/S Ratio of 3.04 is in the upper echelon for the Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AMCR vs. LVS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMCR

3.61

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max
5.73
Q3
3.44
Median
2.08
Q1
1.76
Min
0.55

AMCR’s P/B Ratio of 3.61 is in the upper tier for the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LVS

12.72

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry

Max
24.24
Q3
11.64
Median
4.58
Q1
2.52
Min
0.60

LVS’s P/B Ratio of 12.72 is in the upper tier for the Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AMCR vs. LVS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Gambling, Resorts & Casinos industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMCRLVS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)30.6826.33
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.583.09
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.653.04
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)3.6112.72
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)20.3827.55
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)29.2611.22
EV-to-Sales (TTM)2.184.01