AMCR vs. LVS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMCR and LVS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With AMCR at 21.16 billion USD and LVS at 28.48 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
With betas of 0.78 for AMCR and 0.98 for LVS, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AMCR | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Amcor plc | Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
| Country | CH | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| CEO | Mr. Peter Konieczny Dip Eng, MBA, MSc Mech Eng | Mr. Robert Glen Goldstein |
| Price | 9.18 USD | 40.31 USD |
| Market Cap | 21.16 billion USD | 28.48 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.78 | 0.98 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | May 15, 2012 | December 15, 2004 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMCR and LVS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMCR and LVS, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AMCR | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.24 | 22.01 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.91 | 2.51 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.08 | 2.54 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 3.44 | 10.63 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 19.42 | 23.03 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 28.40 | 9.82 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.13 | 3.51 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 26.03 | 31.77 |
Dividend Comparison
AMCR’s dividend yield of 5.53% is about 148% higher than LVS’s 2.23%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | AMCR | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 5.53% | 2.23% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMCR and LVS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- LVS’s current ratio of 0.59 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AMCR at 1.70 maintains healthy liquidity.
- LVS posts a quick ratio of 0.59, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AMCR at 1.16 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- LVS is highly leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 5.13), elevating both potential gains and risks, compared to AMCR at 2.40, which maintains a steadier capital structure.
| Symbol | AMCR | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.70 | 0.59 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.16 | 0.59 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 2.40 | 5.13 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 0.65 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 8.38 | 3.22 |