AMCR vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMCR and LULU, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
LULU stands out with 36.76 billion USD in market value—about 1.74× AMCR’s market cap of 21.16 billion USD.
LULU carries a higher beta at 1.30, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AMCR remains steadier at 0.78.
| Symbol | AMCR | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Amcor plc | Lululemon Athletica Inc. |
| Country | CH | CA |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Apparel - Retail |
| CEO | Mr. Peter Konieczny Dip Eng, MBA, MSc Mech Eng | Mr. Calvin R. McDonald |
| Price | 9.18 USD | 319.57 USD |
| Market Cap | 21.16 billion USD | 36.76 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.78 | 1.30 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | May 15, 2012 | July 27, 2007 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMCR and LULU over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMCR and LULU, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AMCR | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.24 | 21.43 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.91 | 1.64 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.08 | 3.47 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 3.44 | 8.99 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 19.42 | 23.22 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 28.40 | 12.81 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.13 | 3.43 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 26.03 | 22.96 |
Dividend Comparison
AMCR delivers a 5.53% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas LULU appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | AMCR | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 5.53% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMCR and LULU, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AMCR (at 8.38) covers its interest payments, while LULU shows “--” for minimal debt service.
| Symbol | AMCR | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.70 | 2.16 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.16 | 1.38 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 2.40 | 0.36 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 0.21 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 8.38 | -- |