AMCR vs. HLT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMCR and HLT, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
HLT stands out with 58.65 billion USD in market value—about 2.77× AMCR’s market cap of 21.16 billion USD.
HLT carries a higher beta at 1.23, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AMCR remains steadier at 0.78.
| Symbol | AMCR | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Amcor plc | Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. |
| Country | CH | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Travel Lodging |
| CEO | Mr. Peter Konieczny Dip Eng, MBA, MSc Mech Eng | Mr. Christopher J. Nassetta |
| Price | 9.18 USD | 246.76 USD |
| Market Cap | 21.16 billion USD | 58.65 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.78 | 1.23 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | May 15, 2012 | December 12, 2013 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMCR and HLT over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AMCR and HLT based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- HLT carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -13.70, indicating negative equity. In contrast, AMCR (P/B 3.44) has positive book value.
| Symbol | AMCR | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.24 | 38.19 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.91 | 1.91 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.08 | 5.19 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 3.44 | -13.70 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 19.42 | 30.63 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 28.40 | 27.59 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.13 | 6.18 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 26.03 | 36.45 |
Dividend Comparison
AMCR’s dividend yield of 5.53% is about 2931% higher than HLT’s 0.18%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | AMCR | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 5.53% | 0.18% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMCR and HLT, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- HLT’s current ratio of 0.00 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AMCR at 1.70 maintains healthy liquidity.
- HLT posts a quick ratio of 0.00, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AMCR at 1.16 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- HLT has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -2.71), suggesting asset shortfalls, whereas AMCR at 2.40 preserves healthier equity coverage.
| Symbol | AMCR | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.70 | 0.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.16 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 2.40 | -2.71 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 0.74 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 8.38 | 5.42 |