AMCR vs. FND: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on July 7, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AMCR and FND, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMCR’s market capitalization of 22.20 billion USD is substantially larger than FND’s 8.83 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

FND carries a higher beta at 1.72, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AMCR (beta: 0.73) exhibits greater stability.

Symbol	AMCR	FND
Company Name	Amcor plc	Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.
Country	CH	US
Sector	Consumer Cyclical	Consumer Cyclical
Industry	Packaging & Containers	Home Improvement
CEO	Peter Konieczny Dip Eng, MBA, MSc Mech Eng	Thomas V. Taylor Jr.
Price	9.63 USD	82.07 USD
Market Cap	22.20 billion USD	8.83 billion USD
Beta	0.73	1.72
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
IPO Date	May 15, 2012	April 27, 2017
ADR	No	No

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMCR and FND by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMCR vs. FND: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMCR

11.74%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 20.97%
Q3: 18.53%
Median: 9.15%
Q1: 3.67%
Min: -15.31%

AMCR’s Return on Equity of 11.74% is on par with the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FND

9.58%

Home Improvement Industry

Max: 17.64%
Q3: 15.63%
Median: 8.27%
Q1: 2.23%
Min: 0.65%

FND’s Return on Equity of 9.58% is on par with the norm for the Home Improvement industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. FND: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Packaging & Containers and Home Improvement industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMCR

4.02%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 11.55%
Q3: 9.42%
Median: 6.03%
Q1: 2.83%
Min: -6.57%

AMCR’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.02% is in line with the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

FND

5.22%

Home Improvement Industry

Max: 27.68%
Q3: 17.94%
Median: 5.81%
Q1: 3.74%
Min: 0.32%

FND’s Return on Invested Capital of 5.22% is in line with the norm for the Home Improvement industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AMCR vs. FND: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Packaging & Containers and Home Improvement industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMCR

3.37%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 10.07%
Q3: 5.37%
Median: 3.61%
Q1: 1.49%
Min: -2.97%

AMCR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.37% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FND

4.53%

Home Improvement Industry

Max: 8.98%
Q3: 7.30%
Median: 4.53%
Q1: 3.35%
Min: 0.23%

FND’s Net Profit Margin of 4.53% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Home Improvement industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. FND: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Packaging & Containers and Home Improvement industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMCR

5.29%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 14.60%
Q3: 11.93%
Median: 8.05%
Q1: 5.47%
Min: 2.09%

AMCR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.29% is in the lower quartile for the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FND

6.01%

Home Improvement Industry

Max: 13.24%
Q3: 10.79%
Median: 5.88%
Q1: 3.74%
Min: 0.41%

FND’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.01% is around the midpoint for the Home Improvement industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. FND: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Packaging & Containers and Home Improvement industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	FND
Return on Equity (TTM)	11.74%	9.58%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.51%	3.81%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)	4.02%	5.22%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	3.37%	4.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	5.29%	6.01%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	20.00%	42.22%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMCR

1.70

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 1.88
Q3: 1.79
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.16
Min: 0.80

AMCR’s Current Ratio of 1.70 aligns with the median group of the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FND

1.22

Home Improvement Industry

Max: 1.81
Q3: 1.42
Median: 1.24
Q1: 1.13
Min: 1.01

FND’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Home Improvement industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMCR vs. FND: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Home Improvement industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMCR

2.40

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 2.47
Q3: 2.22
Median: 1.22
Q1: 0.79
Min: 0.56

AMCR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Packaging & Containers industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.40. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FND

0.88

Home Improvement Industry

Max: 1.50
Q3: 1.50
Median: 1.14
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.71

FND’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88 is typical for the Home Improvement industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMCR vs. FND: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Home Improvement industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMCR

2.11

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 6.21
Q3: 4.64
Median: 2.89
Q1: 1.61
Min: -0.51

AMCR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.11 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Packaging & Containers industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FND

113.22

Home Improvement Industry

Max: 77.66
Q3: 36.61
Median: 10.22
Q1: 9.24
Min: 8.80

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 113.22, FND demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Home Improvement industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AMCR vs. FND: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Packaging & Containers and Home Improvement industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	FND
Current Ratio (TTM)	1.70	1.22
Quick Ratio (TTM)	1.16	0.27
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)	2.40	0.88
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)	0.51	0.36
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)	7.17	3.55
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	2.11	113.22

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMCR and FND. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMCR vs. FND: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMCR vs. FND: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMCR vs. FND: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMCR

5.27%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 9.30%
Q3: 4.22%
Median: 2.67%
Q1: 1.42%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.27%, AMCR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Packaging & Containers industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FND

0.00%

Home Improvement Industry

Max: 6.27%
Q3: 2.37%
Median: 1.03%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FND currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMCR vs. FND: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Packaging & Containers and Home Improvement industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMCR

161.75%

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 223.77%
Q3: 154.70%
Median: 54.74%
Q1: 23.39%
Min: 0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 161.75% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

FND

0.00%

Home Improvement Industry

Max: 120.85%
Q3: 88.43%
Median: 49.53%
Q1: 9.42%
Min: 0.00%

FND has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMCR vs. FND: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Home Improvement industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	FND
Dividend Yield (TTM)	5.27%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	161.75%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMCR

30.68

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 57.57
Q3: 40.45
Median: 25.12
Q1: 18.16
Min: 10.25

AMCR’s P/E Ratio of 30.68 is within the middle range for the Packaging & Containers industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FND

42.93

Home Improvement Industry

Max: 39.38
Q3: 35.79
Median: 23.00
Q1: 18.95
Min: 15.05

At 42.93, FND’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Home Improvement industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AMCR vs. FND: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Home Improvement industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMCR

3.58

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 3.19
Q3: 2.69
Median: 2.20
Q1: 2.02
Min: 2.02

AMCR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.58 is exceptionally high for the Packaging & Containers industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

FND

3.01

Home Improvement Industry

Max: 2.96
Q3: 2.76
Median: 2.09
Q1: 1.72
Min: 0.17

FND’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.01 is exceptionally high for the Home Improvement industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

AMCR vs. FND: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Home Improvement industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMCR

1.65

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 1.99
Q3: 1.28
Median: 0.99
Q1: 0.75
Min: 0.36

AMCR’s P/S Ratio of 1.65 is in the upper echelon for the Packaging & Containers industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FND

1.95

Home Improvement Industry

Max: 2.25
Q3: 1.72
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.91
Min: 0.46

FND’s P/S Ratio of 1.95 is in the upper echelon for the Home Improvement industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AMCR vs. FND: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Home Improvement industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMCR

3.61

Packaging & Containers Industry

Max: 5.73
Q3: 3.44
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.76
Min: 0.55

AMCR’s P/B Ratio of 3.61 is in the upper tier for the Packaging & Containers industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FND

3.96

Home Improvement Industry

Max: 3.63
Q3: 3.63
Median: 3.51
Q1: 2.45
Min: 1.05

At 3.96, FND’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Home Improvement industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AMCR vs. FND: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Packaging & Containers and Home Improvement industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	FND
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)	30.68	42.93
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)	3.58	3.01
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)	1.65	1.95
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)	3.61	3.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)	20.38	70.68
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)	29.26	21.32
EV-to-Sales (TTM)	2.18	2.35