AMCR vs. FND: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMCR and FND, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMCR dominates in value with a market cap of 21.16 billion USD, eclipsing FND’s 8.01 billion USD by roughly 2.64×.
FND carries a higher beta at 1.80, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AMCR remains steadier at 0.78.
| Symbol | AMCR | FND |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Amcor plc | Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. |
| Country | CH | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Home Improvement |
| CEO | Mr. Peter Konieczny Dip Eng, MBA, MSc Mech Eng | Mr. Thomas V. Taylor Jr. |
| Price | 9.18 USD | 74.42 USD |
| Market Cap | 21.16 billion USD | 8.01 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.78 | 1.80 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | May 15, 2012 | April 27, 2017 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMCR and FND over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMCR and FND, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AMCR | FND |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.24 | 38.92 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.91 | 2.73 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.08 | 1.77 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 3.44 | 3.59 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 19.42 | 64.09 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 28.40 | 19.66 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.13 | 2.16 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 26.03 | 78.23 |
Dividend Comparison
AMCR delivers a 5.53% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas FND appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | AMCR | FND |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 5.53% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMCR and FND, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- FND posts a quick ratio of 0.27, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AMCR at 1.16 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
| Symbol | AMCR | FND |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.70 | 1.22 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.16 | 0.27 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 2.40 | 0.88 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 0.36 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 8.38 | 113.22 |