AMCR vs. CAVA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 10, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AMCR and CAVA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	AMCR	CAVA
Company Name	Amcor plc	CAVA Group, Inc.
Country	Switzerland	United States
GICS Sector	Materials	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Containers & Packaging	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization	18.40 billion USD	7.32 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	May 15, 2012	June 15, 2023
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMCR and CAVA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMCR vs. CAVA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	CAVA
5-Day Price Return	-3.16%	-0.13%
13-Week Price Return	-18.67%	-29.46%
26-Week Price Return	-16.72%	-24.97%
52-Week Price Return	-28.26%	-49.87%
Month-to-Date Return	-2.57%	4.55%
Year-to-Date Return	-15.30%	-44.01%
10-Day Avg. Volume	17.75M	4.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume	24.22M	4.47M
3-Month Volatility	29.27%	49.95%
Beta	0.71	1.87

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMCR

8.78%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 36.99%
Q3: 19.86%
Median: 10.47%
Q1: 6.76%
Min: -0.20%

AMCR’s Return on Equity of 8.78% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CAVA

20.17%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 84.03%
Q3: 40.12%
Median: 17.38%
Q1: 7.45%
Min: -33.94%

CAVA’s Return on Equity of 20.17% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. CAVA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMCR

3.40%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 10.84%
Q3: 8.25%
Median: 4.91%
Q1: 3.65%
Min: -0.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, AMCR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.40% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CAVA

12.98%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 25.61%
Q3: 14.65%
Median: 8.66%
Q1: 3.36%
Min: -9.83%

CAVA’s Net Profit Margin of 12.98% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. CAVA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMCR

6.72%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 22.03%
Q3: 13.09%
Median: 8.06%
Q1: 6.46%
Min: -0.07%

AMCR’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.72% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CAVA

4.90%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 45.80%
Q3: 22.44%
Median: 14.98%
Q1: 6.59%
Min: -15.28%

CAVA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.90% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AMCR vs. CAVA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	CAVA
Return on Equity (TTM)	8.78%	20.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.32%	11.80%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	3.40%	12.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	6.72%	4.90%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	18.88%	32.26%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

1.21

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 1.96
Q3: 1.45
Median: 1.33
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.87

AMCR’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CAVA

2.72

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 2.73
Q3: 1.63
Median: 1.12
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.18

CAVA’s Current Ratio of 2.72 is in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AMCR vs. CAVA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

1.20

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.15
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.20
Q1: 0.53
Min: 0.23

AMCR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.20 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CAVA

0.00

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 11.29
Q3: 4.71
Median: 1.65
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, CAVA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AMCR vs. CAVA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

2.87

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 13.16
Q3: 8.10
Median: 3.38
Q1: 2.83
Min: 1.06

AMCR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.87 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CAVA

-1,252.06

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 21.72
Q3: 11.40
Median: 4.02
Q1: 1.19
Min: -11.84

CAVA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1,252.06. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AMCR vs. CAVA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	CAVA
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.21	2.72
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.61	2.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.20	0.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	2.87	-1,252.06

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMCR vs. CAVA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMCR vs. CAVA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMCR

4.60%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 7.14%
Q3: 4.65%
Median: 3.69%
Q1: 2.00%
Min: 0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Yield of 4.60% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CAVA

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 6.81%
Q3: 2.73%
Median: 0.74%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CAVA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMCR vs. CAVA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

90.46%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 222.75%
Q3: 132.16%
Median: 65.79%
Q1: 28.53%
Min: 0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 90.46% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CAVA

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 128.39%
Q3: 61.60%
Median: 21.91%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CAVA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMCR vs. CAVA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	CAVA
Dividend Yield (TTM)	4.60%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	90.46%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

35.96

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 24.22
Q3: 20.28
Median: 17.07
Q1: 15.06
Min: 7.79

At 35.96, AMCR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CAVA

52.07

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 56.96
Q3: 33.82
Median: 21.30
Q1: 15.75
Min: 6.06

A P/E Ratio of 52.07 places CAVA in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AMCR vs. CAVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

1.22

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 1.99
Q3: 1.17
Median: 0.94
Q1: 0.55
Min: 0.31

AMCR’s P/S Ratio of 1.22 is in the upper echelon for the Containers & Packaging industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CAVA

6.76

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 7.19
Q3: 3.99
Median: 1.93
Q1: 1.26
Min: 0.17

CAVA’s P/S Ratio of 6.76 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AMCR vs. CAVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

1.81

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.79
Q3: 3.32
Median: 2.14
Q1: 1.60
Min: 0.89

AMCR’s P/B Ratio of 1.81 is within the conventional range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CAVA

13.84

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 24.89
Q3: 11.60
Median: 4.91
Q1: 2.29
Min: 0.37

CAVA’s P/B Ratio of 13.84 is in the upper tier for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AMCR vs. CAVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AMCR	CAVA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	35.96	52.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.22	6.76
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.81	13.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	15.01	154.56