Seek Returns logo

AMCR vs. AS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMCR and AS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMCRAS
Company NameAmcor plcAmer Sports, Inc.
CountrySwitzerlandFinland
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization18.40 billion USD19.15 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 15, 2012February 1, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMCR and AS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMCR vs. AS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMCRAS
5-Day Price Return-3.16%-1.88%
13-Week Price Return-18.67%-10.31%
26-Week Price Return-16.72%40.54%
52-Week Price Return-28.26%101.11%
Month-to-Date Return-2.57%-0.63%
Year-to-Date Return-15.30%23.50%
10-Day Avg. Volume17.75M4.55M
3-Month Avg. Volume24.22M4.21M
3-Month Volatility29.27%41.67%
Beta0.710.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMCR

8.78%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

AMCR’s Return on Equity of 8.78% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AS

4.52%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

AS’s Return on Equity of 4.52% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

AMCR vs. AS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMCR

3.40%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, AMCR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.40% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AS

3.93%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

AS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.93% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. AS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMCR

6.72%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

AMCR’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.72% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AS

9.84%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

AS’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.84% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMCR vs. AS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMCRAS
Return on Equity (TTM)8.78%4.52%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.32%2.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.40%3.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.72%9.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)18.88%56.84%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

1.21

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

AMCR’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AS

1.60

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

AS’s Current Ratio of 1.60 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMCR vs. AS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

1.20

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

AMCR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.20 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AS

0.29

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

AS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMCR vs. AS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

2.87

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

AMCR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.87 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AS

1.61

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, AS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.61 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AMCR vs. AS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMCRAS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.211.60
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.610.48
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.200.29
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.871.61

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMCR vs. AS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMCR vs. AS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMCR

4.60%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Yield of 4.60% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AS

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

AS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMCR vs. AS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

90.46%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

AMCR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 90.46% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AS

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

AS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMCR vs. AS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMCRAS
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.60%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)90.46%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

35.96

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

At 35.96, AMCR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AS

85.38

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

At 85.38, AS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AMCR vs. AS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMCR

1.22

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

AMCR’s P/S Ratio of 1.22 is in the upper echelon for the Containers & Packaging industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AS

3.36

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

AS’s P/S Ratio of 3.36 is in the upper echelon for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AMCR vs. AS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMCR

1.81

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

AMCR’s P/B Ratio of 1.81 is within the conventional range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AS

3.90

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

AS’s P/B Ratio of 3.90 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AMCR vs. AS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMCRAS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.9685.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.223.36
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.813.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.0152.64