AMAT vs. TER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMAT and TER, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMAT dominates in value with a market cap of 131.76 billion USD, eclipsing TER’s 12.67 billion USD by roughly 10.40×.
With betas of 1.71 for AMAT and 1.70 for TER, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AMAT | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Applied Materials, Inc. | Teradyne, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Gary E. Dickerson | Mr. Gregory Stephen Smith |
| Price | 162.18 USD | 78.98 USD |
| Market Cap | 131.76 billion USD | 12.67 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.71 | 1.70 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | September 14, 1970 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMAT and TER over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMAT and TER, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AMAT | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 19.46 | 22.10 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.87 | 0.69 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.69 | 4.36 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.94 | 3.44 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.20 | 20.82 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 15.04 | 17.14 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.69 | 4.22 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 22.22 | 20.15 |
Dividend Comparison
AMAT’s dividend yield of 0.99% is about 62% higher than TER’s 0.61%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | AMAT | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.99% | 0.61% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMAT and TER, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AMAT meets its interest obligations (ratio 31.92). In stark contrast, TER’s negative ratio (-6055.69) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | AMAT | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.46 | 2.70 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.76 | 2.17 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.33 | 0.02 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 31.92 | -6055.69 |