AMAT vs. TEAM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMAT and TEAM, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength.
Company Overview
AMAT’s market capitalization of 136.26 billion USD is substantially larger than TEAM’s 56.60 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.
AMAT’s beta of 1.66 points to significantly higher volatility compared to TEAM (beta: 0.97), suggesting AMAT has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.
| Symbol | AMAT | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Applied Materials, Inc. | Atlassian Corporation |
| Country | US | AU |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Gary E. Dickerson | Mr. Michael Cannon-Brookes |
| Price | 169.79 USD | 214.99 USD |
| Market Cap | 136.26 billion USD | 56.60 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.66 | 0.97 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | December 9, 2015 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMAT and TEAM over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
- AMAT: $7211.91 (-27.88%)
- TEAM: $13203.34 (32.03%)
Valuation Metrics Comparison
This section compares the market valuation of AMAT and TEAM. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.
- TEAM’s Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of -422.89 is negative. This indicates the company is currently not generating profit, a key factor that can weigh on its stock valuation and investor sentiment.
- AMAT’s Forward PEG ratio of 3.03 and TEAM’s Forward PEG ratio of 4.23 are both considered very high. For AMAT, this elevated ratio implies its stock price may incorporate highly optimistic growth assumptions that could be challenging to realize. TEAM’s very high PEG also suggests its valuation is quite rich relative to its expected earnings growth, potentially indicating overvaluation.
| Symbol | AMAT | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 20.38 | -422.89 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 3.03 | 4.23 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.85 | 11.40 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 7.26 | 41.25 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 15.62 | -1214.40 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.85 | 11.12 |
Dividend Comparison
AMAT provides a 0.98% dividend yield, potentially offering a blend of income and growth, whereas TEAM currently does not pay a dividend, possibly retaining profits to fund operations or growth initiatives.
| Symbol | AMAT | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
Explore the financial strength details for AMAT and TEAM in the table below.
| Symbol | AMAT | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.46 | 1.26 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.76 | 1.26 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.33 | 0.90 |
| Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.21 |
| Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 31.48 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 31.92 | 11.22 |