AMAT vs. STX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMAT and STX, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMAT dominates in value with a market cap of 131.76 billion USD, eclipsing STX’s 22.16 billion USD by roughly 5.95×.
With betas of 1.71 for AMAT and 1.34 for STX, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AMAT | STX |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Applied Materials, Inc. | Seagate Technology Holdings plc |
| Country | US | IE |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Computer Hardware |
| CEO | Mr. Gary E. Dickerson | Dr. William David Mosley Ph.D. |
| Price | 162.18 USD | 104.43 USD |
| Market Cap | 131.76 billion USD | 22.16 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.71 | 1.34 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | December 11, 2002 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMAT and STX over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AMAT and STX based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- STX shows a negative forward PEG of -6.15, signaling expected earnings contraction, while AMAT at 2.87 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- STX carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -26.71, indicating negative equity. In contrast, AMAT (P/B 6.94) has positive book value.
| Symbol | AMAT | STX |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 19.46 | 14.82 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.87 | -6.15 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.69 | 2.60 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.94 | -26.71 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.20 | 23.21 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 15.04 | 10.44 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.69 | 2.50 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 22.22 | 22.35 |
Dividend Comparison
STX stands out with a 2.72% dividend yield—around 176% above AMAT’s 0.99%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | AMAT | STX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.99% | 2.72% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMAT and STX, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- STX posts a quick ratio of 0.75, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AMAT at 1.76 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- AMAT meets its interest obligations (ratio 31.92). In stark contrast, STX’s negative ratio (-9.96) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | AMAT | STX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.46 | 1.36 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.76 | 0.75 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.33 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 31.92 | -9.96 |