Seek Returns logo

AMAT vs. SONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMAT and SONY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMAT’s market capitalization stands at 153.32 billion USD, while SONY’s is 154.12 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

AMAT’s beta of 1.66 points to significantly higher volatility compared to SONY (beta: 0.77), suggesting AMAT has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SONY is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. AMAT, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolAMATSONY
Company NameApplied Materials, Inc.Sony Group Corporation
CountryUSJP
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsConsumer Electronics
CEOGary E. DickersonHiroki Totoki
Price191.05 USD25.58 USD
Market Cap153.32 billion USD154.12 billion USD
Beta1.660.77
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980December 1, 1958
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMAT and SONY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMAT vs. SONY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMAT

35.84%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, AMAT’s Return on Equity of 35.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SONY

14.30%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
14.30%
Q3
14.30%
Median
5.13%
Q1
-15.88%
Min
-27.23%

SONY’s Return on Equity of 14.30% is on par with the norm for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMAT vs. SONY: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMAT

25.68%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, AMAT’s Return on Invested Capital of 25.68% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

SONY

4.18%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
4.18%
Q3
4.18%
Median
4.09%
Q1
-0.34%
Min
-0.34%

SONY’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.18% is in line with the norm for the Consumer Electronics industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AMAT vs. SONY: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMAT

24.06%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.06% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SONY

8.81%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
24.30%
Q3
8.81%
Median
8.10%
Q1
-4.74%
Min
-7.22%

SONY’s Net Profit Margin of 8.81% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Consumer Electronics industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMAT vs. SONY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMAT

29.66%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.66% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SONY

10.95%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
31.81%
Q3
16.77%
Median
10.95%
Q1
-0.21%
Min
-4.78%

SONY’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.95% is around the midpoint for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMAT vs. SONY: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMATSONY
Return on Equity (TTM)35.84%14.30%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.09%3.23%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)25.68%4.18%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.06%8.81%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.66%10.95%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.14%28.27%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMAT

2.46

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

AMAT’s Current Ratio of 2.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SONY

0.70

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
0.82
Q3
0.82
Median
0.70
Q1
0.64
Min
0.63

SONY’s Current Ratio of 0.70 aligns with the median group of the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMAT vs. SONY: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMAT

0.33

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AMAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SONY

0.51

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
2.23
Q3
1.47
Median
0.80
Q1
0.51
Min
0.16

SONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 is typical for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMAT vs. SONY: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMAT

31.92

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

AMAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 31.92 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SONY

14.74

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
14.74
Q3
8.73
Median
3.32
Q1
-40.43
Min
-114.16

SONY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.74 is in the upper quartile for the Consumer Electronics industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AMAT vs. SONY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMATSONY
Current Ratio (TTM)2.460.70
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.760.57
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.330.51
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.190.12
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.010.50
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)31.9214.74

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMAT and SONY. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMAT vs. SONY: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMAT vs. SONY: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMAT vs. SONY: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMAT

0.87%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Yield of 0.87% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SONY

0.54%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
1.88%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.50%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.54%, SONY offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Consumer Electronics industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AMAT vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMAT

18.53%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.53% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SONY

10.10%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
98.30%
Q3
15.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.10% is within the typical range for the Consumer Electronics industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMAT vs. SONY: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMATSONY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.87%0.54%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.53%10.10%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMAT

22.93

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

AMAT’s P/E Ratio of 22.93 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SONY

19.47

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
51.71
Q3
41.35
Median
30.99
Q1
25.46
Min
19.94

SONY’s P/E Ratio of 19.47 is below the typical range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

AMAT vs. SONY: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMAT

3.41

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

SONY

2.38

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
7.16
Q3
5.62
Median
3.99
Q1
2.77
Min
2.43

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Consumer Electronics industry.

AMAT vs. SONY: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMAT

5.46

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

AMAT’s P/S Ratio of 5.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SONY

1.71

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
7.50
Q3
4.17
Median
1.76
Q1
0.88
Min
0.16

SONY’s P/S Ratio of 1.71 aligns with the market consensus for the Consumer Electronics industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMAT vs. SONY: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMAT

8.17

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

AMAT’s P/B Ratio of 8.17 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SONY

2.72

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
3.36
Q3
3.36
Median
2.83
Q1
2.78
Min
2.78

SONY’s P/B Ratio of 2.72 is below the established floor for the Consumer Electronics industry. This may signal that the market is deeply pessimistic or has overlooked the company, potentially offering its asset base at a significant discount.

AMAT vs. SONY: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMATSONY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)22.9319.47
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.412.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.461.71
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)8.172.72
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)25.837.91
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)17.579.67
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.461.81