Seek Returns logo

AMAT vs. SNX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMAT and SNX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMAT’s market capitalization of 153.32 billion USD is substantially larger than SNX’s 11.77 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.66 for AMAT and 1.19 for SNX, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAMATSNX
Company NameApplied Materials, Inc.TD SYNNEX Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsTechnology Distributors
CEOGary E. DickersonPatrick Zammit
Price191.05 USD140.21 USD
Market Cap153.32 billion USD11.77 billion USD
Beta1.661.19
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980November 25, 2003
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMAT and SNX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMAT vs. SNX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMAT

35.84%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, AMAT’s Return on Equity of 35.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SNX

11.37%

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
11.37%
Q3
11.14%
Median
9.82%
Q1
7.02%
Min
4.73%

In the upper quartile for the Technology Distributors industry, SNX’s Return on Equity of 11.37% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AMAT vs. SNX: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMAT

25.68%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, AMAT’s Return on Invested Capital of 25.68% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

SNX

9.31%

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
9.31%
Q3
8.74%
Median
7.43%
Q1
6.70%
Min
5.53%

In the upper quartile for the Technology Distributors industry, SNX’s Return on Invested Capital of 9.31% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AMAT vs. SNX: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMAT

24.06%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.06% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SNX

1.54%

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
3.83%
Q3
2.66%
Median
2.26%
Q1
1.49%
Min
1.40%

SNX’s Net Profit Margin of 1.54% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Technology Distributors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMAT vs. SNX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMAT

29.66%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.66% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SNX

2.10%

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
3.90%
Q3
3.67%
Median
2.86%
Q1
2.76%
Min
2.10%

SNX’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.10% is in the lower quartile for the Technology Distributors industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AMAT vs. SNX: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMATSNX
Return on Equity (TTM)35.84%11.37%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.09%3.04%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)25.68%9.31%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.06%1.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.66%2.10%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.14%6.74%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMAT

2.46

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

AMAT’s Current Ratio of 2.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SNX

1.26

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
3.16
Q3
2.26
Median
1.43
Q1
1.24
Min
1.05

SNX’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Technology Distributors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMAT vs. SNX: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMAT

0.33

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AMAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SNX

0.05

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
0.60
Q3
0.53
Median
0.15
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

SNX’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.05 is typical for the Technology Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMAT vs. SNX: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMAT

31.92

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

AMAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 31.92 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SNX

-114.61

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
5.83
Q3
5.83
Median
5.38
Q1
3.31
Min
3.31

SNX has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -114.61. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AMAT vs. SNX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMATSNX
Current Ratio (TTM)2.461.26
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.760.75
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.330.05
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.190.01
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.01-0.35
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)31.92-114.61

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMAT and SNX. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMAT vs. SNX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMAT vs. SNX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMAT vs. SNX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMAT

0.87%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Yield of 0.87% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SNX

1.20%

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.00%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.20%, SNX offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Technology Distributors industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AMAT vs. SNX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMAT

18.53%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.53% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SNX

15.36%

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
35.81%
Q3
15.47%
Median
13.50%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SNX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.36% is within the typical range for the Technology Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMAT vs. SNX: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMATSNX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.87%1.20%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.53%15.36%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMAT

22.93

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

AMAT’s P/E Ratio of 22.93 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SNX

12.57

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
23.75
Q3
21.15
Median
17.13
Q1
14.38
Min
12.09

In the lower quartile for the Technology Distributors industry, SNX’s P/E Ratio of 12.57 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AMAT vs. SNX: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMAT

3.41

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

SNX

0.98

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
1.73
Q3
1.53
Median
0.97
Q1
0.72
Min
0.45

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Technology Distributors industry.

AMAT vs. SNX: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMAT

5.46

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

AMAT’s P/S Ratio of 5.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SNX

0.20

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
0.93
Q3
0.55
Median
0.32
Q1
0.22
Min
0.19

In the lower quartile for the Technology Distributors industry, SNX’s P/S Ratio of 0.20 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AMAT vs. SNX: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMAT

8.17

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

AMAT’s P/B Ratio of 8.17 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SNX

1.40

Technology Distributors Industry

Max
2.70
Q3
2.33
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.93

SNX’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is within the conventional range for the Technology Distributors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AMAT vs. SNX: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Technology Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMATSNX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)22.9312.57
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.410.98
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.460.20
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)8.171.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)25.8319.45
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)17.5710.34
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.460.19