Seek Returns logo

AMAT vs. SAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMAT and SAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

SAP’s market capitalization of 354.32 billion USD is significantly greater than AMAT’s 153.32 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AMAT’s beta of 1.66 points to significantly higher volatility compared to SAP (beta: 0.94), suggesting AMAT has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SAP is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. AMAT, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolAMATSAP
Company NameApplied Materials, Inc.Sap Se
CountryUSDE
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsSoftware - Application
CEOGary E. DickersonChristian Klein
Price191.05 USD303.72 USD
Market Cap153.32 billion USD354.32 billion USD
Beta1.660.94
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980September 18, 1995
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMAT and SAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMAT vs. SAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMAT

35.84%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, AMAT’s Return on Equity of 35.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SAP

13.18%

Software - Application Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
17.85%
Median
4.73%
Q1
-10.56%
Min
-52.94%

SAP’s Return on Equity of 13.18% is on par with the norm for the Software - Application industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMAT vs. SAP: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMAT

25.68%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, AMAT’s Return on Invested Capital of 25.68% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

SAP

11.46%

Software - Application Industry

Max
35.07%
Q3
9.72%
Median
0.76%
Q1
-8.68%
Min
-34.12%

In the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, SAP’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.46% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AMAT vs. SAP: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMAT

24.06%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.06% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SAP

16.31%

Software - Application Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
16.07%
Median
1.83%
Q1
-9.60%
Min
-45.64%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.31% places SAP in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AMAT vs. SAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMAT

29.66%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.66% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SAP

25.56%

Software - Application Industry

Max
51.67%
Q3
15.35%
Median
1.79%
Q1
-12.42%
Min
-45.17%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.56% places SAP in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AMAT vs. SAP: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMATSAP
Return on Equity (TTM)35.84%13.18%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.09%7.58%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)25.68%11.46%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.06%16.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.66%25.56%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.14%73.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMAT

2.46

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

AMAT’s Current Ratio of 2.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SAP

1.17

Software - Application Industry

Max
5.09
Q3
2.84
Median
1.70
Q1
1.12
Min
0.04

SAP’s Current Ratio of 1.17 aligns with the median group of the Software - Application industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMAT vs. SAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMAT

0.33

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AMAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SAP

--

Software - Application Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
0.77
Median
0.18
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

Debt-to-Equity Ratio data for SAP is currently unavailable.

AMAT vs. SAP: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMAT

31.92

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

AMAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 31.92 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SAP

8.41

Software - Application Industry

Max
39.23
Q3
8.55
Median
1.48
Q1
-14.59
Min
-39.97

SAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.41 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software - Application industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMAT vs. SAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMATSAP
Current Ratio (TTM)2.461.17
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.761.17
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.33--
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.19--
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.01-1.04
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)31.928.41

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMAT and SAP. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMAT vs. SAP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMAT vs. SAP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMAT vs. SAP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMAT

0.87%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Yield of 0.87% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SAP

0.79%

Software - Application Industry

Max
3.66%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.79%, SAP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Software - Application industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AMAT vs. SAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMAT

18.53%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.53% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SAP

44.75%

Software - Application Industry

Max
81.09%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.75% is in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AMAT vs. SAP: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMATSAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.87%0.79%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.53%44.75%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMAT

22.93

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

AMAT’s P/E Ratio of 22.93 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SAP

52.02

Software - Application Industry

Max
194.31
Q3
98.56
Median
51.87
Q1
22.76
Min
1.02

SAP’s P/E Ratio of 52.02 is within the middle range for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMAT vs. SAP: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMAT

3.41

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

SAP

2.65

Software - Application Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
6.57
Median
2.78
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

SAP’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.65 is within the middle range of its peers in the Software - Application industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AMAT vs. SAP: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMAT

5.46

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

AMAT’s P/S Ratio of 5.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SAP

8.48

Software - Application Industry

Max
23.49
Q3
11.14
Median
5.62
Q1
2.84
Min
0.33

SAP’s P/S Ratio of 8.48 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMAT vs. SAP: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMAT

8.17

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

AMAT’s P/B Ratio of 8.17 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SAP

6.52

Software - Application Industry

Max
21.03
Q3
10.49
Median
6.36
Q1
2.89
Min
0.12

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.

AMAT vs. SAP: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMATSAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)22.9352.02
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.412.65
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.468.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)8.176.52
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)25.8354.53
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)17.5726.29
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.468.16