AMAT vs. QBTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

AMAT dwarfs QBTS in market cap, clocking in at 131.76 billion USD—about 29.72 times the 4.43 billion USD of its counterpart.

AMAT rides a wilder wave with a beta of 1.71, hinting at bigger swings than QBTS’s steadier 0.89.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AMAT and QBTS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AMAT and QBTS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• QBTS shows a negative P/E of -33.33, highlighting a year of losses with no net profit generated. Meanwhile, AMAT at 19.46 has sustained positive earnings, offering a more stable earnings foundation.
• QBTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -84.98, indicating it’s spent more cash than it’s brought in over the past year—a cash flow shortfall that raises questions about its operational sustainability. Meanwhile, AMAT at 22.20 maintains a positive cash position.

Dividend Comparison

AMAT’s 0.99% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike QBTS, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits AMAT’s balanced approach against QBTS’s long-term focus.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AMAT and QBTS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• QBTS’s -28.05 sits under 1.5, where earnings hug interest costs too closely—a squeeze if income dips. Meanwhile, AMAT at 31.92 has room to breathe.