AMAT vs. OLED: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMAT and OLED, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMAT dominates in value with a market cap of 131.76 billion USD, eclipsing OLED’s 6.94 billion USD by roughly 18.99×.
With betas of 1.71 for AMAT and 1.46 for OLED, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
Symbol | AMAT | OLED |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Applied Materials, Inc. | Universal Display Corporation |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
CEO | Mr. Gary E. Dickerson | Mr. Steven V. Abramson |
Price | 162.18 USD | 145.96 USD |
Market Cap | 131.76 billion USD | 6.94 billion USD |
Beta | 1.71 | 1.46 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | April 11, 1996 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMAT and OLED over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMAT and OLED, please refer to the table below.
Symbol | AMAT | OLED |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 19.46 | 30.24 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.87 | 1.53 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.69 | 10.69 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.94 | 4.18 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.20 | 42.39 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 15.04 | 25.07 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.69 | 10.45 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 22.22 | 41.42 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AMAT and OLED offer similar dividend yields (0.99% vs. 1.13%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
Symbol | AMAT | OLED |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.99% | 1.13% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMAT and OLED, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AMAT (at 31.92) covers its interest payments, while OLED shows “--” for minimal debt service.
Symbol | AMAT | OLED |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.46 | 9.00 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.76 | 7.26 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.33 | 0.00 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.00 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 31.92 | -- |