Seek Returns logo

AMAT vs. OLED: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMAT and OLED, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMAT’s market capitalization of 153.32 billion USD is substantially larger than OLED’s 7.61 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.66 for AMAT and 1.51 for OLED, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAMATOLED
Company NameApplied Materials, Inc.Universal Display Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductors
CEOGary E. DickersonSteven V. Abramson
Price191.05 USD160.11 USD
Market Cap153.32 billion USD7.61 billion USD
Beta1.661.51
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980April 11, 1996
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMAT and OLED by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMAT vs. OLED: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMAT

35.84%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, AMAT’s Return on Equity of 35.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

OLED

14.37%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

OLED’s Return on Equity of 14.37% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMAT vs. OLED: A comparison of their ROE against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

AMAT

25.68%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, AMAT’s Return on Invested Capital of 25.68% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

OLED

12.99%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, OLED’s Return on Invested Capital of 12.99% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AMAT vs. OLED: A comparison of their ROIC against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

AMAT

24.06%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.06% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

OLED

35.39%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 35.39% places OLED in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AMAT vs. OLED: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

AMAT

29.66%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.66% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

OLED

37.86%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 37.86% places OLED in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AMAT vs. OLED: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMATOLED
Return on Equity (TTM)35.84%14.37%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.09%12.31%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)25.68%12.99%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.06%35.39%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.66%37.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.14%75.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMAT

2.46

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

AMAT’s Current Ratio of 2.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

OLED

9.00

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

OLED’s Current Ratio of 9.00 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AMAT vs. OLED: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMAT

0.33

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AMAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

OLED

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

Debt-to-Equity Ratio data for OLED is currently unavailable.

AMAT vs. OLED: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMAT

31.92

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

AMAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 31.92 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

OLED

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for OLED is currently unavailable.

AMAT vs. OLED: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMATOLED
Current Ratio (TTM)2.469.00
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.767.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.33--
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.19--
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.01-0.58
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)31.92--

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMAT and OLED. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMAT vs. OLED: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMAT vs. OLED: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMAT vs. OLED: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMAT

0.87%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Yield of 0.87% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

OLED

1.06%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.06%, OLED offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AMAT vs. OLED: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMAT

18.53%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.53% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

OLED

34.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

OLED’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 34.00% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AMAT vs. OLED: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMATOLED
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.87%1.06%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.53%34.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMAT

22.93

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

AMAT’s P/E Ratio of 22.93 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

OLED

33.17

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

OLED’s P/E Ratio of 33.17 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMAT vs. OLED: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMAT

3.41

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

OLED

1.68

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

AMAT vs. OLED: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMAT

5.46

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

AMAT’s P/S Ratio of 5.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

OLED

11.73

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

OLED’s P/S Ratio of 11.73 is in the upper echelon for the Semiconductors industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AMAT vs. OLED: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMAT

8.17

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

AMAT’s P/B Ratio of 8.17 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

OLED

4.59

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

OLED’s P/B Ratio of 4.59 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AMAT vs. OLED: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMATOLED
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)22.9333.17
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.411.68
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.4611.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)8.174.59
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)25.8346.50
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)17.5727.56
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.4611.49