AMAT vs. NET: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMAT and NET, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMAT dwarfs NET in market cap, clocking in at 131.76 billion USD—about 2.43 times the 54.25 billion USD of its counterpart.
AMAT at 1.71 and NET at 1.78 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
| Symbol | AMAT | NET |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Applied Materials, Inc. | Cloudflare, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Mr. Gary E. Dickerson | Mr. Matthew Prince J.D. |
| Price | 162.18 USD | 156.52 USD |
| Market Cap | 131.76 billion USD | 54.25 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.705 | 1.785 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | September 13, 2019 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMAT and NET over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AMAT and NET based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- NET shows a negative P/E of -662.24, highlighting a year of losses with no net profit generated. Meanwhile, AMAT at 19.46 has sustained positive earnings, offering a more stable earnings foundation.
| Symbol | AMAT | NET |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 19.46 | -662.24 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.87 | 6.62 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.69 | 30.65 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.94 | 37.95 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.20 | 294.56 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 15.04 | 627.17 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.69 | 31.37 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 22.22 | 301.47 |
Dividend Comparison
AMAT’s 0.99% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike NET, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits AMAT’s balanced approach against NET’s long-term focus.
| Symbol | AMAT | NET |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.99% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMAT and NET, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- NET’s -27.68 sits under 1.5, where earnings hug interest costs too closely—a squeeze if income dips. Meanwhile, AMAT at 31.92 has room to breathe.
| Symbol | AMAT | NET |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.46 | 3.20 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.76 | 3.20 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.33 | 1.04 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.40 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 31.92 | -27.68 |