Seek Returns logo

AMAT vs. MNDY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMAT and MNDY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMAT’s market capitalization of 153.32 billion USD is substantially larger than MNDY’s 15.61 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.66 for AMAT and 1.30 for MNDY, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAMATMNDY
Company NameApplied Materials, Inc.monday.com Ltd.
CountryUSIL
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsSoftware - Application
CEOGary E. DickersonEran Zinman
Price191.05 USD307.4 USD
Market Cap153.32 billion USD15.61 billion USD
Beta1.661.30
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980June 10, 2021
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMAT and MNDY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMAT vs. MNDY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMAT

35.84%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, AMAT’s Return on Equity of 35.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MNDY

5.60%

Software - Application Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
17.85%
Median
4.73%
Q1
-10.56%
Min
-52.94%

MNDY’s Return on Equity of 5.60% is on par with the norm for the Software - Application industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMAT vs. MNDY: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMAT

25.68%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, AMAT’s Return on Invested Capital of 25.68% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

MNDY

-0.53%

Software - Application Industry

Max
35.07%
Q3
9.72%
Median
0.76%
Q1
-8.68%
Min
-34.12%

MNDY has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.53%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AMAT vs. MNDY: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMAT

24.06%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.06% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MNDY

5.08%

Software - Application Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
16.07%
Median
1.83%
Q1
-9.60%
Min
-45.64%

MNDY’s Net Profit Margin of 5.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software - Application industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMAT vs. MNDY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMAT

29.66%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.66% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MNDY

-0.60%

Software - Application Industry

Max
51.67%
Q3
15.35%
Median
1.79%
Q1
-12.42%
Min
-45.17%

MNDY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.60%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AMAT vs. MNDY: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMATMNDY
Return on Equity (TTM)35.84%5.60%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.09%3.13%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)25.68%-0.53%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.06%5.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.66%-0.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.14%89.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMAT

2.46

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

AMAT’s Current Ratio of 2.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MNDY

2.66

Software - Application Industry

Max
5.09
Q3
2.84
Median
1.70
Q1
1.12
Min
0.04

MNDY’s Current Ratio of 2.66 aligns with the median group of the Software - Application industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMAT vs. MNDY: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMAT

0.33

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AMAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MNDY

0.10

Software - Application Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
0.77
Median
0.18
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

MNDY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.10 is typical for the Software - Application industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMAT vs. MNDY: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMAT

31.92

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

AMAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 31.92 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MNDY

--

Software - Application Industry

Max
39.23
Q3
8.55
Median
1.48
Q1
-14.59
Min
-39.97

Interest Coverage Ratio data for MNDY is currently unavailable.

AMAT vs. MNDY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMATMNDY
Current Ratio (TTM)2.462.66
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.762.66
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.330.10
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.190.06
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.01-205.31
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)31.92--

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMAT and MNDY. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMAT vs. MNDY: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMAT vs. MNDY: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMAT vs. MNDY: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMAT

0.87%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Yield of 0.87% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MNDY

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
3.66%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MNDY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMAT vs. MNDY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMAT

18.53%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.53% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MNDY

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
81.09%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MNDY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMAT vs. MNDY: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMATMNDY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.87%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.53%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMAT

22.93

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

AMAT’s P/E Ratio of 22.93 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MNDY

297.41

Software - Application Industry

Max
194.31
Q3
98.56
Median
51.87
Q1
22.76
Min
1.02

At 297.41, MNDY’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Software - Application industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AMAT vs. MNDY: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMAT

3.41

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

MNDY

11.76

Software - Application Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
6.57
Median
2.78
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

A Forward PEG Ratio of 11.76 places MNDY in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

AMAT vs. MNDY: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMAT

5.46

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

AMAT’s P/S Ratio of 5.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MNDY

15.05

Software - Application Industry

Max
23.49
Q3
11.14
Median
5.62
Q1
2.84
Min
0.33

MNDY’s P/S Ratio of 15.05 is in the upper echelon for the Software - Application industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AMAT vs. MNDY: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMAT

8.17

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

AMAT’s P/B Ratio of 8.17 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MNDY

15.22

Software - Application Industry

Max
21.03
Q3
10.49
Median
6.36
Q1
2.89
Min
0.12

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.

AMAT vs. MNDY: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMATMNDY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)22.93297.41
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.4111.76
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.4615.05
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)8.1715.22
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)25.8352.86
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)17.572249.12
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.4613.79