Seek Returns logo

AMAT vs. IBM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMAT and IBM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMATIBM
Company NameApplied Materials, Inc.International Business Machines Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentIT Services
Market Capitalization173.29 billion USD268.62 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMAT and IBM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMAT vs. IBM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMATIBM
5-Day Price Return6.14%3.06%
13-Week Price Return13.86%-1.23%
26-Week Price Return49.90%15.97%
52-Week Price Return8.14%31.24%
Month-to-Date Return6.25%2.20%
Year-to-Date Return33.76%31.18%
10-Day Avg. Volume10.23M5.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.73M4.73M
3-Month Volatility43.10%26.49%
Beta1.670.67

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMAT

35.91%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, AMAT’s Return on Equity of 35.91% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IBM

21.99%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.99% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AMAT vs. IBM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMAT

23.88%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

AMAT’s Net Profit Margin of 23.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IBM

9.11%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 9.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMAT vs. IBM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMAT

30.14%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.14% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IBM

9.77%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

IBM’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.77% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMAT vs. IBM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMATIBM
Return on Equity (TTM)35.91%21.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.15%4.12%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)23.88%9.11%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)30.14%9.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.50%57.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMAT

2.50

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

AMAT’s Current Ratio of 2.50 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IBM

0.91

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

IBM’s Current Ratio of 0.91 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AMAT vs. IBM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMAT

0.32

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

AMAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.32 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IBM

2.33

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.33. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AMAT vs. IBM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMAT

41.21

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

AMAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 41.21 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IBM

45.57

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMAT vs. IBM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMATIBM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.500.91
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.690.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.322.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)41.2145.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMAT vs. IBM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMAT vs. IBM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMAT

0.76%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Yield of 0.76% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IBM

2.29%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.29%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AMAT vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMAT

19.73%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.73% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IBM

75.57%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 75.57% is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AMAT vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMATIBM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.76%2.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)19.73%75.57%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMAT

26.07

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

AMAT’s P/E Ratio of 26.07 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IBM

46.41

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

A P/E Ratio of 46.41 places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AMAT vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMAT

6.23

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

AMAT’s P/S Ratio of 6.23 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IBM

4.23

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 4.23 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMAT vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMAT

7.83

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

AMAT’s P/B Ratio of 7.83 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

IBM

9.96

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

IBM’s P/B Ratio of 9.96 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AMAT vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMATIBM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.0746.41
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.234.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.839.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.5923.03