AMAT vs. HUBS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at AMAT and HUBS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Overview
AMAT’s market capitalization of 153.32 billion USD is substantially larger than HUBS’s 29.58 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.
With betas of 1.66 for AMAT and 1.70 for HUBS, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.
| Symbol | AMAT | HUBS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Applied Materials, Inc. | HubSpot, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Application |
| CEO | Gary E. Dickerson | Yamini Rangan |
| Price | 191.05 USD | 560.86 USD |
| Market Cap | 153.32 billion USD | 29.58 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.66 | 1.70 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | October 9, 2014 |
| ADR | No | No |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of AMAT and HUBS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Profitability
Return on Equity
AMAT
35.84%
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 41.84%
- Q3
- 15.81%
- Median
- 6.31%
- Q1
- -5.54%
- Min
- -30.12%
In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, AMAT’s Return on Equity of 35.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
HUBS
-1.27%
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 59.01%
- Q3
- 17.85%
- Median
- 4.73%
- Q1
- -10.56%
- Min
- -52.94%
HUBS has a negative Return on Equity of -1.27%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.
Return on Invested Capital
AMAT
25.68%
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 30.91%
- Q3
- 11.34%
- Median
- 4.08%
- Q1
- -2.17%
- Min
- -19.59%
In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, AMAT’s Return on Invested Capital of 25.68% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.
HUBS
-0.18%
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 35.07%
- Q3
- 9.72%
- Median
- 0.76%
- Q1
- -8.68%
- Min
- -34.12%
HUBS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.18%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.
Net Profit Margin
AMAT
24.06%
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 51.69%
- Q3
- 19.67%
- Median
- 8.56%
- Q1
- -5.44%
- Min
- -38.60%
A Net Profit Margin of 24.06% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
HUBS
-0.85%
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 48.14%
- Q3
- 16.07%
- Median
- 1.83%
- Q1
- -9.60%
- Min
- -45.64%
HUBS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.85%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.
Operating Profit Margin
AMAT
29.66%
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 58.03%
- Q3
- 22.12%
- Median
- 8.40%
- Q1
- -3.73%
- Min
- -36.14%
An Operating Profit Margin of 29.66% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
HUBS
-2.60%
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 51.67%
- Q3
- 15.35%
- Median
- 1.79%
- Q1
- -12.42%
- Min
- -45.17%
HUBS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.60%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | AMAT | HUBS |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 35.84% | -1.27% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 20.09% | -0.59% |
| Return on Invested Capital (TTM) | 25.68% | -0.18% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 24.06% | -0.85% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 29.66% | -2.60% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 48.14% | 84.83% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio
AMAT
2.46
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 9.10
- Q3
- 5.23
- Median
- 3.09
- Q1
- 2.49
- Min
- 1.02
AMAT’s Current Ratio of 2.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
HUBS
1.66
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 5.09
- Q3
- 2.84
- Median
- 1.70
- Q1
- 1.12
- Min
- 0.04
HUBS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 aligns with the median group of the Software - Application industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio
AMAT
0.33
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 0.97
- Q3
- 0.46
- Median
- 0.21
- Q1
- 0.05
- Min
- 0.00
AMAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
HUBS
0.33
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 1.85
- Q3
- 0.77
- Median
- 0.18
- Q1
- 0.05
- Min
- 0.00
HUBS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 is typical for the Software - Application industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
Interest Coverage Ratio
AMAT
31.92
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 36.25
- Q3
- 29.12
- Median
- 7.01
- Q1
- -1.22
- Min
- -18.18
AMAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 31.92 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.
HUBS
-33.04
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 39.23
- Q3
- 8.55
- Median
- 1.48
- Q1
- -14.59
- Min
- -39.97
HUBS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -33.04. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | AMAT | HUBS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.46 | 1.66 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.76 | 1.66 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.17 |
| Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 0.34 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 31.92 | -33.04 |
Growth
The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMAT and HUBS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.
Revenue Growth
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Free Cash Flow Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield
AMAT
0.87%
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 6.48%
- Q3
- 0.93%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
AMAT’s Dividend Yield of 0.87% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
HUBS
0.00%
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 3.66%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
HUBS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio
AMAT
18.53%
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 204.29%
- Q3
- 31.85%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
AMAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.53% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
HUBS
0.00%
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 81.09%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
HUBS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | AMAT | HUBS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.87% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 18.53% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio
AMAT
22.93
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 86.15
- Q3
- 47.38
- Median
- 27.87
- Q1
- 18.89
- Min
- 4.73
AMAT’s P/E Ratio of 22.93 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
HUBS
-1,266.34
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 194.31
- Q3
- 98.56
- Median
- 51.87
- Q1
- 22.76
- Min
- 1.02
HUBS has a negative P/E Ratio of -1,266.34. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.
Forward P/E to Growth Ratio
AMAT
3.41
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 4.73
- Q3
- 2.80
- Median
- 1.11
- Q1
- 0.68
- Min
- 0.01
The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.
HUBS
-67.63
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 15.44
- Q3
- 6.57
- Median
- 2.78
- Q1
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.00
HUBS has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -67.63. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.
Price-to-Sales Ratio
AMAT
5.46
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 21.96
- Q3
- 10.21
- Median
- 4.45
- Q1
- 2.32
- Min
- 0.48
AMAT’s P/S Ratio of 5.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
HUBS
10.86
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 23.49
- Q3
- 11.14
- Median
- 5.62
- Q1
- 2.84
- Min
- 0.33
HUBS’s P/S Ratio of 10.86 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio
AMAT
8.17
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 13.12
- Q3
- 6.49
- Median
- 3.31
- Q1
- 1.74
- Min
- 0.23
AMAT’s P/B Ratio of 8.17 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
HUBS
14.59
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 21.03
- Q3
- 10.49
- Median
- 6.36
- Q1
- 2.89
- Min
- 0.12
The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | AMAT | HUBS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 22.93 | -1266.34 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 3.41 | -67.63 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.46 | 10.86 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 8.17 | 14.59 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 25.83 | 48.54 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 17.57 | 334.07 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 5.46 | 10.87 |