Seek Returns logo

AMAT vs. GIB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMAT and GIB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMAT’s market capitalization of 153.32 billion USD is substantially larger than GIB’s 23.55 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

AMAT’s beta of 1.66 points to significantly higher volatility compared to GIB (beta: 0.65), suggesting AMAT has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAMATGIB
Company NameApplied Materials, Inc.CGI Inc.
CountryUSCA
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsInformation Technology Services
CEOGary E. DickersonFrancois Boulanger
Price191.05 USD106.19 USD
Market Cap153.32 billion USD23.55 billion USD
Beta1.660.65
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980October 7, 1998
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMAT and GIB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMAT vs. GIB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMAT

35.84%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, AMAT’s Return on Equity of 35.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GIB

18.19%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

GIB’s Return on Equity of 18.19% is on par with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMAT vs. GIB: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMAT

25.68%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, AMAT’s Return on Invested Capital of 25.68% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

GIB

-104.90%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

GIB has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -104.90%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AMAT vs. GIB: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMAT

24.06%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.06% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GIB

11.52%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

GIB’s Net Profit Margin of 11.52% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMAT vs. GIB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMAT

29.66%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.66% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GIB

-142.29%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

GIB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -142.29%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AMAT vs. GIB: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMATGIB
Return on Equity (TTM)35.84%18.19%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.09%9.32%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)25.68%-104.90%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.06%11.52%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.66%-142.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.14%-137.84%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMAT

2.46

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

AMAT’s Current Ratio of 2.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GIB

1.27

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

GIB’s Current Ratio of 1.27 aligns with the median group of the Information Technology Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMAT vs. GIB: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMAT

0.33

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AMAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GIB

0.43

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

GIB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.43 is typical for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMAT vs. GIB: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMAT

31.92

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

AMAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 31.92 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

GIB

-240.43

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

GIB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -240.43. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AMAT vs. GIB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMATGIB
Current Ratio (TTM)2.461.27
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.760.92
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.330.43
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.190.23
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.011.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)31.92-240.43

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMAT and GIB. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMAT vs. GIB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMAT vs. GIB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMAT vs. GIB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMAT

0.87%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Yield of 0.87% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GIB

0.35%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GIB’s Dividend Yield of 0.35% is consistent with its peers in the Information Technology Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AMAT vs. GIB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMAT

18.53%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.53% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GIB

3.91%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GIB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.91% is within the typical range for the Information Technology Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMAT vs. GIB: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMATGIB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.87%0.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.53%3.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMAT

22.93

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

AMAT’s P/E Ratio of 22.93 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GIB

18.55

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

GIB’s P/E Ratio of 18.55 is within the middle range for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMAT vs. GIB: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMAT

3.41

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

GIB

2.62

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

GIB’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.62 is within the middle range of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AMAT vs. GIB: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMAT

5.46

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

AMAT’s P/S Ratio of 5.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GIB

2.09

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

GIB’s P/S Ratio of 2.09 aligns with the market consensus for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMAT vs. GIB: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMAT

8.17

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

AMAT’s P/B Ratio of 8.17 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GIB

3.18

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

AMAT vs. GIB: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMATGIB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)22.9318.55
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.412.62
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.462.09
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)8.173.18
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)25.8315.94
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)17.5711.66
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.462.31