AMAT vs. GDDY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMAT and GDDY, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMAT dominates in value with a market cap of 131.76 billion USD, eclipsing GDDY’s 26.15 billion USD by roughly 5.04×.
AMAT’s beta of 1.71 points to much larger expected swings compared to GDDY’s calmer 1.13, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | AMAT | GDDY |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Applied Materials, Inc. | GoDaddy Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Mr. Gary E. Dickerson | Mr. Amanpal Singh Bhutani |
| Price | 162.18 USD | 183.49 USD |
| Market Cap | 131.76 billion USD | 26.15 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.71 | 1.13 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | March 31, 2015 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMAT and GDDY over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMAT and GDDY, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AMAT | GDDY |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 19.46 | 34.44 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.87 | 1.34 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.69 | 5.61 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.94 | 130.18 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.20 | 19.09 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 15.04 | 30.44 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.69 | 5.48 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 22.22 | 18.63 |
Dividend Comparison
AMAT delivers a 0.99% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas GDDY appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | AMAT | GDDY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.99% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMAT and GDDY, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- GDDY’s current ratio of 0.56 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AMAT at 2.46 maintains healthy liquidity.
- GDDY posts a quick ratio of 0.56, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AMAT at 1.76 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
| Symbol | AMAT | GDDY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.46 | 0.56 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.76 | 0.56 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.33 | 0.45 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.01 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 31.92 | 9.41 |