AMAT vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

AMAT’s market capitalization of 131.76 billion USD is substantially larger than FTV’s 24.39 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.66 for AMAT and 1.16 for FTV, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AMAT and FTV over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

This section compares the market valuation of AMAT and FTV. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.

• AMAT’s Forward PEG ratio of 2.94 is very high, suggesting its stock might be overvalued if its price has substantially outrun its future earnings growth forecast. FTV’s Forward PEG ratio of -0.31 is negative, often an indicator of issues such as negative current earnings or anticipated earnings contraction, which calls its fundamental valuation into question.

Dividend Comparison

AMAT’s dividend yield of 1.01% is notably higher than FTV’s 0.45%, suggesting a stronger emphasis on returning cash to shareholders.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section evaluates the financial strength of AMAT and FTV. Noteworthy observations on their financial resilience, considered from an industry perspective, are detailed in the points that follow.

• FTV’s current ratio of 0.99 falls into the low category. This can indicate potential stress on the company's ability to address its short-term liabilities, suggesting that its liquid assets may not provide a strong safety margin over its immediate financial commitments, possibly impacting its operational flexibility.