AMAT vs. FIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMAT and FIS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMAT dominates in value with a market cap of 131.76 billion USD, eclipsing FIS’s 41.60 billion USD by roughly 3.17×.
AMAT’s beta of 1.71 points to much larger expected swings compared to FIS’s calmer 1.10, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | AMAT | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Applied Materials, Inc. | Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Consumer Electronics |
| CEO | Mr. Gary E. Dickerson | Ms. Stephanie L. Ferris |
| Price | 162.18 USD | 79.17 USD |
| Market Cap | 131.76 billion USD | 41.60 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.71 | 1.10 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | June 20, 2001 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMAT and FIS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMAT and FIS, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AMAT | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 19.46 | 50.67 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.87 | 7.02 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.69 | 4.08 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.94 | 2.77 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.20 | 26.36 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 15.04 | 15.35 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.69 | 5.19 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 22.22 | 33.51 |
Dividend Comparison
FIS stands out with a 1.87% dividend yield—around 89% above AMAT’s 0.99%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | AMAT | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.99% | 1.87% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMAT and FIS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- FIS’s current ratio of 0.63 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AMAT at 2.46 maintains healthy liquidity.
- FIS posts a quick ratio of 0.63, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AMAT at 1.76 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
| Symbol | AMAT | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.46 | 0.63 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.76 | 0.63 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.33 | 0.80 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.37 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 31.92 | 6.73 |