AMAT vs. CRM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMAT and CRM, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
CRM stands out with 270.84 billion USD in market value—about 2.06× AMAT’s market cap of 131.76 billion USD.
With betas of 1.71 for AMAT and 1.42 for CRM, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AMAT | CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Applied Materials, Inc. | Salesforce, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Gary E. Dickerson | Mr. Marc R. Benioff |
| Price | 162.18 USD | 282.28 USD |
| Market Cap | 131.76 billion USD | 270.84 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.71 | 1.42 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | June 23, 2004 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMAT and CRM over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMAT and CRM, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AMAT | CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 19.46 | 43.68 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.87 | 3.85 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.69 | 7.15 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.94 | 4.43 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.20 | 21.78 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 15.04 | 33.74 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.69 | 7.21 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 22.22 | 21.99 |
Dividend Comparison
AMAT’s dividend yield of 0.99% is about 72% higher than CRM’s 0.57%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | AMAT | CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.99% | 0.57% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMAT and CRM, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AMAT (at 31.92) covers its interest payments, while CRM shows “--” for minimal debt service.
| Symbol | AMAT | CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.46 | 1.06 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.76 | 1.06 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.33 | 0.19 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.11 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 31.92 | -- |