Seek Returns logo

AMAT vs. CDNS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMAT and CDNS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMATCDNS
Company NameApplied Materials, Inc.Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentSoftware
Market Capitalization129.17 billion USD94.13 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980June 10, 1987
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMAT and CDNS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMAT vs. CDNS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMATCDNS
5-Day Price Return-14.49%-0.99%
13-Week Price Return-3.00%7.85%
26-Week Price Return-12.65%16.64%
52-Week Price Return-23.69%22.52%
Month-to-Date Return-10.61%-5.24%
Year-to-Date Return-1.03%14.97%
10-Day Avg. Volume10.18M1.49M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.26M1.92M
3-Month Volatility39.21%35.84%
Beta1.811.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMAT

35.84%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, AMAT’s Return on Equity of 35.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CDNS

21.28%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

CDNS’s Return on Equity of 21.28% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMAT vs. CDNS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMAT

24.06%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.06% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CDNS

19.88%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.88% places CDNS in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AMAT vs. CDNS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMAT

29.66%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.66% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CDNS

30.24%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.24% places CDNS in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AMAT vs. CDNS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMATCDNS
Return on Equity (TTM)35.84%21.28%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.02%11.04%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.06%19.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.66%30.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.14%85.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMAT

2.46

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

AMAT’s Current Ratio of 2.46 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CDNS

2.82

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CDNS’s Current Ratio of 2.82 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AMAT vs. CDNS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMAT

0.33

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

AMAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CDNS

0.50

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CDNS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMAT vs. CDNS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMAT

41.21

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

AMAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 41.21 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CDNS

39.06

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CDNS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 39.06 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AMAT vs. CDNS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMATCDNS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.462.82
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.672.33
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.330.50
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)41.2139.06

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMAT vs. CDNS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMAT vs. CDNS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMAT

1.02%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Yield of 1.02% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CDNS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CDNS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMAT vs. CDNS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMAT

19.40%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.40% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CDNS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CDNS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMAT vs. CDNS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMATCDNS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.02%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)19.40%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMAT

19.07

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, AMAT’s P/E Ratio of 19.07 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CDNS

92.61

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

CDNS’s P/E Ratio of 92.61 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMAT vs. CDNS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMAT

4.59

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

AMAT’s P/S Ratio of 4.59 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CDNS

18.41

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

CDNS’s P/S Ratio of 18.41 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AMAT vs. CDNS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMAT

6.46

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

AMAT’s P/B Ratio of 6.46 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CDNS

16.81

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CDNS’s P/B Ratio of 16.81 is in the upper tier for the Software industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AMAT vs. CDNS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMATCDNS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.0792.61
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.5918.41
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.4616.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.9959.12