Seek Returns logo

AMAT vs. APH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMAT and APH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMAT’s market capitalization stands at 153.32 billion USD, while APH’s is 120.31 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 1.66 for AMAT and 1.13 for APH, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAMATAPH
Company NameApplied Materials, Inc.Amphenol Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsHardware, Equipment & Parts
CEOGary E. DickersonRichard Adam Norwitt
Price191.05 USD99.46 USD
Market Cap153.32 billion USD120.31 billion USD
Beta1.661.13
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980November 8, 1991
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMAT and APH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMAT vs. APH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMAT

35.84%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, AMAT’s Return on Equity of 35.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

APH

27.13%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
17.03%
Median
8.95%
Q1
1.23%
Min
-14.34%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, APH’s Return on Equity of 27.13% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AMAT vs. APH: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMAT

25.68%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, AMAT’s Return on Invested Capital of 25.68% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

APH

15.20%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
17.24%
Q3
9.87%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.56%
Min
-7.50%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, APH’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.20% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AMAT vs. APH: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMAT

24.06%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.06% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

APH

15.58%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
22.76%
Q3
11.04%
Median
3.80%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-8.57%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.58% places APH in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AMAT vs. APH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMAT

29.66%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.66% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

APH

21.26%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
13.73%
Median
8.22%
Q1
4.35%
Min
-0.79%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.26% places APH in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AMAT vs. APH: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMATAPH
Return on Equity (TTM)35.84%27.13%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.09%11.41%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)25.68%15.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.06%15.58%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.66%21.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.14%33.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMAT

2.46

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

AMAT’s Current Ratio of 2.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

APH

1.99

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
3.23
Median
2.37
Q1
1.81
Min
0.58

APH’s Current Ratio of 1.99 aligns with the median group of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMAT vs. APH: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMAT

0.33

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

AMAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APH

0.70

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
0.56
Median
0.33
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

APH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AMAT vs. APH: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMAT

31.92

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

AMAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 31.92 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

APH

13.97

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.37
Q3
14.25
Median
9.35
Q1
2.86
Min
-13.16

APH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMAT vs. APH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMATAPH
Current Ratio (TTM)2.461.99
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.761.36
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.330.70
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.190.31
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.011.29
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)31.9213.97

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMAT and APH. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMAT vs. APH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMAT vs. APH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMAT vs. APH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMAT

0.87%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Yield of 0.87% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

APH

0.66%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
2.16%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.66%, APH offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AMAT vs. APH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMAT

18.53%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.53% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

APH

25.37%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
71.55%
Q3
25.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.37% is within the typical range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMAT vs. APH: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMATAPH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.87%0.66%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.53%25.37%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMAT

22.93

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

AMAT’s P/E Ratio of 22.93 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APH

46.05

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
86.58
Q3
53.54
Median
36.07
Q1
25.99
Min
12.16

APH’s P/E Ratio of 46.05 is within the middle range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMAT vs. APH: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMAT

3.41

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

APH

4.55

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.22
Q3
3.27
Median
2.16
Q1
1.77
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

AMAT vs. APH: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMAT

5.46

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

AMAT’s P/S Ratio of 5.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APH

7.17

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.95
Median
2.45
Q1
1.17
Min
0.32

APH’s P/S Ratio of 7.17 is in the upper echelon for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AMAT vs. APH: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMAT

8.17

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

AMAT’s P/B Ratio of 8.17 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

APH

11.68

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
4.63
Median
3.34
Q1
2.35
Min
0.48

At 11.68, APH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AMAT vs. APH: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMATAPH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)22.9346.05
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.414.55
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.467.17
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)8.1711.68
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)25.8354.11
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)17.5729.53
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.467.50